Home > PJ (Current issue) > Meetings and Conferences | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7269 p462
4 October 2003

This article
Reprint
Photocopy

British Pharmaceutical Conference 2003

BPC 2003 summary


Drug delivery

Delivering drugs via the inhalation route was among the topics covered at drug delivery sessions in honour of Professor Bob Davis on September 15. Gareth Jones, editor of Hospital Pharmacist, reports

Inhaled insulin heralds new preparations

The world is waiting for inhaled insulin to become available before further significant sums are put into research for other systemically absorbed pulmonary dosage forms, said Professor Peter Byron from Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia. Several insulin inhaler devices are now in phase III clinical trials. It is possible to get reproducible absorption with inhaled insulin. The bioavailability is around five per cent relative to intravenous administration. However, there is currently a delay in inhaled insulins becoming available while the manufacturers complete toxicological studies.

Many researchers have shown that with animal models, good absorption of inhaled macromolecules can be achieved, said Professor Byron. In rat studies, 50 per cent bioavailability has been achieved via the intratracheal route. A longer half-life than with intravenous administration is seen due to slow rates of absorption from the lung. With this slow rate of absorption, ciliary clearance can be a problem as it is clearly likely to reduce overall absorption. Therefore, when delivering macromolecular drugs to the lung, with the aim of achieving systemic absorption, it is necessary to deliver the drug to the pulmonary or alveolar region where there is much slower clearance than in the upper airways. Professor Byron pointed out that the devices that are being developed to deliver insulin will need to be far more efficient than asthma delivery devices if systemic absorption is to be achieved.

For the successful development of marketable products for pulmonary drug delivery, good devices and formulations need to be developed. Alveolar transporters may also be developed which will improve the degree and speed of absorption, Professor Byron added.

He then moved on to local drug delivery to the lung, where there have been shake-outs in the market in the past ten years.

A good inhaler device for local delivery to the lung should have the following properties: reproducible aerosol size/dose, not contain chlorofluorocarbon propellants, have a good shelf life, be easy to use, be cheap and offer multiple new and old drugs in similar formats. There are many examples of these products on the market, although they are not efficient.

Some of the formulation challenges still present, he said, include achieving reproducible delivered doses and aerosol size distribution throughout the life of a multidose preparation, avoiding the change in delivered doses that can occur in suspensions, preventing suspended materials from being expelled onto the internal container surfaces and dealing with partial drug solubility which often leads to crystal growth.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal