Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7271 p543
18 October 2003

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 90K

Letters

  Concordance
  The Profession
  Remuneration
  Consultants
  Modernisation
  Workforce census
  SOPs
  Specials
  The Society


Letters to the Editor

Remuneration

Fixed remuneration package needed

From Mr A. Sidhu, MRPharmS

When is our profession going to move away from a profit-driven service to a patient-driven service? Community pharmacy, in general, only exists to make a profit. Why do we not get a fixed remuneration package for providing services to the community with the number of high street pharmacies allowed in one primary care trust linked to the average number of items dispensed in any given PCT area?

This way the issue of contract limitation can rectify itself by the opening of new pharmacies where needed, and each pharmacy will take a fair share of the item workload for that area. This should avoid the issue of having a number of pharmacies in one locality, with one pharmacy dispensing the majority of items.

With pharmacies dispensing the same number of items there would an equal distribution of resources and remuneration.

Amandip Sidhu
Pinner, Middlesex

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (The Profession)
Next Topic (Consultants)

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal