Home > PJ (Current issue) > Meetings and Conferences | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7271 p556
18 October 2003

This article
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 70K

Meetings & Conferences

See Reports

European College of Neuropsychopharmacology

The 16th annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology was held in Prague from 20 to 24 September. Lin-Nam Wang (on the staff of The Journal) reports

Age and gender likely to impact upon the treatment of depression

Failure to pay attention to age and gender could confound predictions of response to antidepressants, according to Professor Peter Joyce, department of psychological medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand. Typical predictors of response to treatment with an antidepressant include the depressive symptoms suffered, the diagnosis, co-morbidities and concurrent intake of drugs or alcohol (if more than four units per day). However, perhaps it is time for age and gender to be considered, Professor Joyce suggested as he went on to give an overview of studies that have examined age and gender differences in treatment response and tolerability.

Researchers found that when patients with major depression were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of treatment with either imipramine or sertraline, significantly more women responded to sertraline than to imipramine and significantly more men responded to imipramine than to sertraline. Gender and the drug a patient was randomised to take also influenced numbers of drop outs from the trial, with women taking imipramine and men taking sertraline more likely to drop out. These differences were not observed in postmenopausal women, suggesting a hormonal link to responsiveness and tolerability.

Fluoxetine is better tolerated in women than in men

Similarly, a study led by Professor Joyce indicates that women are better able to tolerate fluoxetine than nortryptiline and the converse applies to men (Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2002;36:384–91). Further research led by Professor Joyce (to be published) in which patients were randomised to fluoxetine or nortryptiline, shows that 67 per cent of those aged 18 to 24 years in the fluoxetine arm responded to treatment but only 26 per cent in the nortryptiline arm responded. In comparison, the proportions of responders in patients over 25 years, in both arms, were closer. The study also suggested that clomipramine was better than desipramine in patients under 25 years, but further trials are needed, Professor Joyce said.

In addition, the study found that men aged over 40 years with melancholia respond better to tricyclic antidepressants than selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors. In men, the density of 5-HT1A receptors in the orbito-frontal cortex markedly decrease with age and Professor Joyce suggested this as a possible explanation for the poorer response.

Gender, age and compliance
Professor Koen Demyttenaere, department of psychiatry, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Belgium, told the audience that age and gender were also factors that could affect compliance with treatment. The most effective way to see if patients are taking their medicines is to use technology such as the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS). This uses microelectronic technology in bottle caps to record each time a bottle is opened and, if it can be assumed that every time a bottle is opened then a tablet is taken, this gives a reliable measure of compliance.

Typically, a patient prescribed one tablet a day will take the tablet promptly, (eg, at 7pm), for the first few days, but by days 10 to 20, the patient will take the tablet a little earlier or a later, and after day 20 doses might be missed. Factors influencing compliance include drug regimen, age and gender, and Professor Demyttenaere highlighted some of the evidence.

One study found that women achieve a greater percentage of days with correct dosing than men (52 per cent compared with 33 per cent, P=0.02). Also, simply asking patients to self-monitor their tablet taking (by keeping a diary) increased compliance by about 10 per cent in both genders (this was confirmed using MEMS). In another study, 270 patients diagnosed with major depression were telephoned each month. Reasons for stopping treatment included adverse effects, fear of drug dependence, lack of efficacy and the patient’s belief that he or she had to get better without drugs. The major reason (55 per cent), however, was feeling better. Perhaps most interesting was that men tend to stop taking their medicine as soon as they start to feel better but women continue.

In terms of age, it is a misconception that older patients are less compliant and most studies find that non-compliance is higher in younger people. Although non-compliance is always a problem in patients with depression, most doctors only tackle compliance if a patient is not responding to treatment. Doctors, Professor Demyttenaere said, have different reactions towards non-compliance. One study, classed 59 per cent of doctors as “ego-defensive” (non-compliance was the patient’s fault) and 10 per cent as “avoiding” (an alternative treatment would be tried). Only 31 per cent were “task-oriented” and tried to find the cause of non-compliance. Perhaps it is time to look more at the interaction aspects of compliance and this means the relationships between the physician, patient, partner and pharmacist, he said.

Speaking to The Journal after his presentation, Professor Demyttenaere said: “There is good evidence of the educational role that pharmacists can play, but they have to be careful — sometimes one word rather than another can give the patient a negative impression”.


Using old drugs for new indications

Drugs approved for treating other diseases could play a role in strategies to treat Alzheimer’s disease, Professor Konrad Beyreuther, centre for molecular biology, University of Heidelberg, Germany, said during the congress. Professor Beyreuther highlighted retrospective epidemiological studies and experiments, which suggest that treatment with a cholesterol lowering drug reduces production of abeta peptides that are the main component of senile plaques.

Epidemiological studies indicate that treatment with statins reduces the relative risk of Alzheimer’s disease by a factor of three. In a 26-week, randomised controlled trial 44 patients with Alzheimer’s disease were either given up to 80mg simvastatin daily or a placebo. Decreased levels of abeta peptides were found in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with mild disease. Furthermore, disease progression in patients in the treatment group was slower (indicated by mini-mental state examination) but longer term and larger trials are needed, Professor Beyreuther said.

The Journal attended the ECNP congress courtesy of Eli Lilly


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal