|
Concordance
Tritace
Modernisation
The Charter
Specials
Automation
Remuneration
The Profession
Letters to the Editor
|
Modernisation
Examples of political posturing
From Mr A. Burr, MRPharmS
I read the letters on modernisation (PJ, 18 October, pp544–5),
with a wry smile, as examples of political posturing and the difficulty
some individuals have with the fundamental democratic decision-making
process. This comes at a time when the Council of the Royal Pharmaceutical
Society has been working well together and embracing the diverse experience
and opinion around the table.
I was pleased to see my fellow Council member, Ashwin Tanna, encourage
members to express their views on the revised draft Charter although
members reading his letter could almost be forgiven for believing he
was not on the Council. As a member of the Council he has been part of
the same decision-making process and as such carries the same collective
responsibility as us all. On the Council, one cannot be assured that
one’s own personal viewpoint will win the day, nor should it, if
the arguments made are not robust enough to stand up to public scrutiny.
Hassan Argomandkhah, a former Council member and member of the Save
Our Society campaign, champions the special general meeting motion that sought
a referendum on the Charter. When the Council made the decision, after
a morning of full and frank debate, to allow further consultation rather
than a referendum, none of the SOS candidates elected raised the issue
of the referendum. In a press release issued on 20 October by the SOS
campaign, Mr Argomandkhah promises to deliver a petition on 1 December
demanding a referendum. His comment is far more telling about the real
reasons for, as he puts it, “another photo opportunity”.
In response to Graham Phillips’s letter about the absence of the
word “representation”, the answer is “no”.
Andrew Burr
Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands
|