Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7272 p579
25 October 2003

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 110K

Letters

  Concordance
  Tritace
  Modernisation
  The Charter
  Specials
  Automation
  Remuneration
  The Profession


Letters to the Editor

The Charter

New Charter links and articles

Undemocratic haste is best avoided

From Mr M. A. Walker, MRPharmS

The latest draft (PDF 100K) Supplemental Charter (PJ, 18 October) is a significant improvement over the last one and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s Council is to be congratulated for listening to much of what the members said.

This draft introduces devolution, giving the Council the responsibility to establish appropriate structures for Scotland and Wales. The Council also would have the power to establish or dissolve the structure through which it works, doing this without reference to members or the Privy Council. These are undoubtedly major constitutional powers, potentially impacting on all of the profession of pharmacy — not just the Society. For example, the Council would have the power to dissolve the regions and branches, then set up “colleges” by a simple Council vote.

Despite the magnitude of the change proposed, the Modernisation Steering Group (MSG) says “the petition needs to be finalised by December”. This gives members less than three weeks to send in any feedback. It will be impossible for regions, branches and professional groups to consult their members and give a considered response in this timeframe. It is clearly undemocratic haste on the part of the MSG to demand responses by 14 November.

We are told that the MSG’s timetable is needed in order to align with the Section 60 Order timetable. After the Secretary of State for Health publishes the draft Section 60 Order he will allow feedback for a fixed period before the Order is made. In contrast, the MSG document implies that the Council must make necessary changes, agree the final draft Supplemental Charter in December. After this there is no process for feedback from the profession of pharmacy before the document is submitted to the Privy Council.

The Council must reverse this timetable recommended by the MSG. It must focus on making our 21st century Supplemental Charter an excellent, member-supported document which could last for the next 50 years, a feat achieved by its predecessor.

At this important juncture for the profession of pharmacy undemocratic haste is best avoided.

Mark Walker
Oxford

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Modernisation)
Next Topic (Specials)

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal