Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7272 p579
25 October 2003

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 110K

Letters

  Concordance
  Tritace
  Modernisation
  The Charter
  Specials
  Automation
  Remuneration
  The Profession


Letters to the Editor

Specials

Unacceptably excessive?

Time we charged for our expertise

Unacceptably excessive?

From Mr D. R. Thomas, MRPharmS

I was astonished by the letter from Maureen Chapman (PJ, 11 October, p491) regarding specials and taxpayers not getting value for money.

On receiving a quote of that magnitude for preparing 400g 25 per cent salicylic acid in white soft paraffin (a relatively simple product), it would have been sensible to inform the prescriber before ordering because the price quoted appears ridiculously high. It is not fair to expect a doctor to be aware of the cost of such items when he or she writes the prescription, especially for a simple product.

I would add, without I hope seeming rude or patronising to a fellow pharmacist, that the onus for protecting taxpayers’ money in this case rests with the pharmacist.

The price stated by the company involved, even taking into account conservative ingredient costs, labour charges and overheads, is unacceptably excessive in my opinion.

I am sure that my contemporaries would agree that this preparation and similar have been competently prepared over many years by the application of secundem artem.

David R. Thomas
Feltham, Middlesex


Time we charged for our expertise

From Mr Z. Silver, MRPharmS

I see that Maureen Chapman believes that a charge of over £150 is excessive for the supply of 400g of a specially formulated ointment quickly delivered to her pharmacy (PJ, 11 October, p491).

It is surely time we were charging for our knowledge and expertise. We all know how much an emergency plumber or car mechanic charges. We pay this willingly because we are not prepared to fix our own blocked sink or grinding gears.

The Royal Pharmaceutical Society demands that we all invest time and money in new learning and in expanding our knowledge and expertise. Time is money! What are we to get for this investment? If we already have expert knowledge, are we not entitled to charge for it? And if we invest more to improve our knowledge should we not expect a return?

Let us all stand up proud, secure in our expertise, and be prepared to charge for it.

Zvi Silver
Edgware, Middlesex

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (The Charter)
Next Topic (Automation)

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal