Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7273 p611
1 November 2003

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 120K

Letters

  Concordance
  Law and Ethics
  Out of hours
  Ask about medicines
  Ramadan
  Needle exchange
  Specials
  Ramipril
  Medication errors
  Preregistration exam
  The Charter
  The Profession


Letters to the Editor

Out of hours

Is it good or bad for pharmacy?

From Mr K. M. J. Tull, MRPharmS

A caller rings the out-of-hours service at 6.10pm and connects to the Birmingham call centre, which, in theory, contacts the local doctor in Hereford. However, recently, this service was busy so the “prime objective” of the out-of-hours service came into force, which is to get a doctor to speak to the patient as soon as possible. The call was then diverted to a less busy out-of-hours doctor, based in Southampton. The caller needed advice on the fact that her son had run out of his anti-schizophrenic medicines, on which he had just been stabilised.

The doctor then had to find a pharmacy open at this time in Hereford, succeeding at 8.10pm in locating us. The drugs in question were a tricyclic antidepressant and olanzapine. An exchange then took place between the experienced locum and the Southampton doctor: “Who are you and how do I know that you are a doctor?”

They came to a compromise and decided that an emergency supply could be dispensed, provided the patient’s mother came back the next day with a prescription for the medicines. Luckily, she did, even though this required two journeys of 40 miles each. The next day a standard operating procedure was developed to deal with this scenario in future. From now on if the out-of-hours service rings us, we require a fax to prove the existence of a prescription. However we still have a few problems:

1. How do we know that the doctor is who he says he is, since we do not have proof of signature? Do we now have to have a copy of every doctor’s signature in the country to confirm this?

2. How do we know if an out-of-hours service prescription pad has been stolen, since a prescription could now come from anywhere in the country?

3. The ‘Medicines, ethics and practice’ guide (Number 27, p11) states that the original of a faxed prescription must be at the pharmacy in a short period of time? What period of time is that?

4. Now that the prime objective of an out-of-hours service is to get a doctor and patient together as fast as possible, does the emergency supply at the request of a patient discontinue? Do I just give the patient the NHS number and tell them to ring it?

I think all late night pharmacies should be aware of the legality of these prescriptions in order to protect themselves.

Jethroe Tull
Hereford

 

Lynsey Balmer, pharmacist adviser, professional standards directorate, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, replies:

I will deal with each of the issues Mr Tull has raised in turn:

1. Pharmacists are expected to take steps to confirm the credentials of any practitioner not known to them. Pharmacists can telephone the General Medical Council on 020 7915 3630 to confirm that a doctor is registered. This number provides a 24-hour automated fax back service; the doctor’s GMC number is required.

2. Pharmacists should take all reasonable steps available to satisfy themselves that a prescription is genuine. It is recognised that it may be more difficult to conduct relevant checks outside the normal working day and in the absence of evidence to suggest a prescription is not genuine, pharmacists may decide to dispense it in good faith. Pharmacists should not, however, dispense any prescription that they believe to be forged.

3. Pharmacists should only supply prescription-only medicines against a legally valid prescription or in an emergency, provided certain conditions are satisfied. A fax is not a legally valid prescription since it is not written in indelible ink or signed by the practitioner. A fax can, however, confirm a valid prescription is in existence. If a pharmacist decides to supply a prescription-only medicine before receiving a valid prescription, the supply would need to satisfy the requirements of an emergency supply and a record should be made in the prescription register. An emergency supply at the request of a practitioner requires the prescriber to furnish a prescription within 72 hours.

4. There is a provision in legislation for pharmacists to make an emergency supply of prescription-only medicines at the request of a patient. Pharmacists would need to make a professional decision as to whether it is in the patient’s best interests to make an emergency supply or to refer him or her to a medical practitioner. The decision would depend on factors such as the medication required and accessibility to a medical practitioner.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Law and Ethics)
Next Topic (Ask about medicines)

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal