Home > PJ (current issue) > News / Daily News | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7274 p635
8 November 2003

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary

Related websites
Charter links (more)
Better Regulation Task Force (www.brtf.gov.uk)
Better Regulation Task Force report: independent regulators (PDF 200K)


SOS group challenges Society over consultation

A call has been issued to the Royal Pharmaceutical Society to follow regulatory principles set out by a Government task force as the Society seeks to replace its Royal Charter. The Society believes, however, that it has fulfilled its obligations.

In an open letter to the Society’s President, Dr Gill Hawksworth, six members of the Save Our Society campaign, including two former members of the Society’s council, say that the consultation process leading up to the application for a new royal Charter should comply with better regulation principles.

In particular, the SOS representatives are concerned that the Society should adhere to four consultation principles set out in the Better Regulation Task Force report on independent regulators (PJ, 25 October, p569). The four principles are:

• Policy objectives should be clearly defined and effectively communicated
• Effective consultation should take place before proposals are developed
• Consultation should last for 12 weeks
• Regulations should be clear and simple and guidance should be issued 12 weeks before they take effect

The writers of the open letter — Hassan Argomandkhah, Anthony Cox, Maurice Hickey, Mark Koziol, Gavin Miller and Graham Phillips — are particularly concerned that the Society has given its members only five weeks to comment on the revised draft Charter. They are further concerned that the draft refers to a Health Act 1999 Section 60 Order which has not been published. They say that the time frame allowed for the consultation is unacceptable.

“There is no doubt that currently, the Society’s programme for consultation on this draft Charter is, in a number of important respects, wholly at odds with the principles of regulation as defined by government,” the open letter says. “As such it makes any recommendations that the Society may subsequently make to government vulnerable to challenge.”

Ann Lewis, Secretary and Registrar, said: “We have been consulting with the members on the new Charter since March this year.”

She added that the Society’s Council had considered feedback from that consultation carefully and was now giving an additional opportunity to comment further to help inform the Council’s final decisions. The further consultation on the revised draft Charter is brief so that the Society’s views could be passed to the Government before it produced its draft legislation. A notice will be published in the London Gazette (an official newspaper of record) once the petition for a new Charter has been submitted to the Privy Council. Views can be sent direct to the Privy Council at that stage.

Miss Lewis pointed out that the task force report allows for shorter consultation on changes made after consultation on initial proposals. When the Government publishes its draft Section 60 Order it will be open to three months’ public consultation.


  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal