Home > PJ (current issue) > News / Daily News | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7275 p666
15 November 2003

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary

Related websites
Scientific sessions 2003 (more)
American Heart Association (more)
New England Journal of Medicine abstract (more)


Valsartan effective alternative to ACE inhibitors after heart attack

Valsartan (Diovan), the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, is an effective alternative to angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors after heart attack, researchers report.

The valsartan in acute myocardial infarction trial (VALIANT) compared valsartan with captopril in 14,703 patients who had developed heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction after a myocardial infarction (MI). Patients were randomised to receive captopril (titrated to a maximum dose of 50mg three times a day), valsartan (titrated to 160mg twice a day) or a combination of both drugs (titrated to captopril 50mg three times a day plus valsartan 80mg twice a day). Treatment was started 0.5 to 10 days after the MI.

After two years, the number of patients who had died was the same in all three groups. “In patients with MI complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction or both, valsartan is as effective as captopril in reducing risk of death, reducing cardiovascular death, reducing non-fatal MI and reducing heart failure,” said Dr Marc Pfeffer, trial author and senior cardiovascular physician, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

No additional survival benefits were seen in the combination group. Furthermore, combination therapy resulted in an increased number of adverse events. Overall number of adverse events was similar in the captopril and valsartan groups, although different types of event were observed.

Dr Raymond Gibbons, chairman of the American Heart Association committee on science sessions programme, said that the trial provided evidence that valsartan could be used in patients who had unacceptable side effects while taking ACE inhibitors. “It will impact on clinical practice and, with time, on existing guidance,” he said.

Commenting on the VALIANT results, Dr Betram Pitt, Ann Arbor, Michigan, said: “Clearly I would feel confident now to use an angiotensin II receptor blocker as an equivalent to an ACE inhibitor in patients after an acute MI with heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction. Having said that, we need to be cautious about extrapolating the data.” He stressed that the study only examined patients in an acute situation. “ACE inhibitors remain the therapy of choice in chronic heart failure,” he said.


The study was presented and discussed on 10 November at the American Heart Association conference in Orlando, Florida. It is also published in The New England Journal of Medicine (2003;349:1893).

The Journal’s attendance at the AHA conference was made possible by Pfizer. Coverage of the conference continues next week.

Reports

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal