Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7278 p773
6 December 2003

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 110K

Letters

  Drug interaction alerts
  Emollients
  Tacrolimus
  Dispensing
  Community pharmacy
  Hospital pharmacy
  Packaging
  Modernisation
  Pharmacy contract


Letters to the Editor

Drug interaction alerts

Responding to drug interaction alerts is difficult

Serious interactions may be overlooked

Overhaul has already been done

Responding to drug interaction alerts is difficult

From Dr K. E. Neil, MRPharmS

A recent Broad Spectrum article (PJ, 22 November, p708) draws attention to some of the problems associated with responding to drug interactions in primary care and particularly community pharmacy. This is an area in which I have been interested for some time.

The problems with drug interaction alerts highlighted by John Wilson are common to both general practice and community pharmacy. They leave health professionals feeling overwhelmed and it is therefore not surprising that many of these copious warnings are ignored.

Dr Ivan H. Stockley from the University of Nottingham is recognised as a world expert in the field of drug interactions and has produced a comprehensive reference book. This is an essential guide to the clinical relevance of drug interactions and provides concise advice regarding their management. I take my own copy to all locum placements and find that general practitioners are grateful when I relay the practical information it contains.

I find that one of the most difficult problems relates to those interactions that require close monitoring. Community pharmacists do not currently have access to biochemical data and the decision to contact the GP is a difficult one. Added to time restraints, dealing with drug interaction queries is extremely difficult and good support staff are essential. When working as a community pharmacist, I find myself selectively contacting GPs I know who welcome such intervention, or occasionally asking patients when they last had a blood test.

There is work under way to improve drug interaction software and Dr Stockley has produced a database including short advisory messages for GPs and pharmacists. The National Patient Safety Agency is currently involved in work to identify hazardous interactions with the aim of making warnings relating to these interactions difficult to override. In the meantime, I would encourage readers to consult ‘Stockley’s drug interactions’.1 Readers may also be interested in the prescribing safety series currently running in Prescriber (www.escriber.com), which includes examples of detailed case studies taken from our work on the prescribing of hazardous or contraindicated drug combinations in general practice.2

Karen Neil
Nottingham


References
1. I. H. Stockley (editor). Stockley’s drug interactions, 6th edition. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2002.
2. Chen YF, Avery AJ, Neil KE. Assessing the occurrence and preventability of prescribing potentially hazardous/contraindicated drug combinations in general (family) practice. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety 2001;10:S53.


Serious interactions may be overlooked

From Mr P. J. Beckley, MRPharmS

As a pharmacist working in a “prescription factory” receiving many prescriptions with more than 10 items, usually for patients over 80 years old, I would like to express my appreciation to John Wilson for drawing attention to the problem caused by computerised drug interaction alerts (PJ, 22 November, p708).

My system even flashes up an “interaction” between identical drugs, eg, diclofenac, and I have been concerned for some time that serious interactions may be overlooked in such a maze of misleading information.

I sincerely hope that the companies responsible for these programs will consider the issues raised in this excellent article and work with community pharmacists to resolve them.

Peter Beckley
Crawley, West Sussex


Overhaul has already been done

From Dr I. H. Stockley, FRPharmS

The title of John Wilson’s Broad Spectrum article (“Crying wolf! Why computerised drug interaction alerts need an overhaul” (PJ, 22 November, p708) neatly sums up his conclusions after tussling with some obviously irritating and unhelpful interaction alerts while doing locums. But Mr Wilson, I have already done this overhauling exercise. It is very much past history. What needs to be done now is the replacement of these alerting systems by something much better.

My overhaul almost precisely followed Mr Wilson’s list of recommendations. I went through the vast list of interactions to filter off the “noise” of unimportant interactions, retaining only those where the pharmacist needs to do something in response. I wrote a series of short alerts saying what happens (and sometimes why) when particular pairs of drugs interact. Each alert was given a broad “hazard/severity” rating with an indication of incidence and magnitude wherever possible; and all of them were rounded off with a suggested course of action for the pharmacist. I also designed the alerts to be linked to a coloured traffic-light coding system.

You can see these “Stockley Drug Interaction Alerts” in action on NDC’s “Pharmacy Manager” computer system in the United Kingdom. A new combined system of alerts appropriate for both doctors and pharmacists has also recently been written.

I think that these alerts are practically tailor-made for Mr Wilson’s requirements. But do not just take my word for it. See for yourself.

Ivan Stockley
Willoughby-on-the-Wolds, Leicestershire

Send your letter to The Editor

Next Topic (Emollients)

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal