Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7280 p840-841
20/27 December 2003

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 75K

Letters

  Modernisation
  MHRA leaflet
  Aqueous cream
  CPD
  Ramipril
  Community pharmacy
  Fellowships
  Top-up fees
  Product names


Letters to the Editor

Aqueous cream

Involve patients in choice of emollient

Patients should try a variety of emollients

Involve patients in choice of emollient

Dr R. P. Tucker, MRPharmS

I read with interest the article (PDF 75K) by Michael Cork et al (PJ, 29 November, p747) on the problems associated with aqueous cream. This mirrors to some degree my own experience of dealing with patients with skin problems. I have also noticed that patients complain that the cream can cause a burning or stinging sensation, although I should add that such adverse reactions can also occur with other emollient preparations. As a result, I tend to recommend that patients use aqueous cream as a soap substitute (though many also find it of benefit for shaving) and allow them to select an alternative product for use during the day.

The simple fact that aqueous cream is inexpensive should not be the main reason for its inclusion in primary care trust formularies. Although there is a paucity of clinical evidence to demonstrate superiority of one emollient over another, the importance of patient choice should not be overlooked.

Furthermore, involving patients in the choice of an emollient achieves a greater degree of compliance. With a potentially large number of patients with atopic eczema and other dry skin conditions, helping patients to select an appropriate emollient, and advising on its use, is perhaps an ideal role for community pharmacists as suggested in a recent report.1 Such a role will be of enormous benefit and serve as yet another example of the ways in which community pharmacists can make a valuable contribution to the health and well-being of the general public.

Rod Tucker
Beverley, East Yorkshire

Reference
1. Report on the enquiry into primary care dermatology services. London: Associate Parliamentary Group on Skin; 2002.


Patients should try a variety of emollients

From Mr P. Lapsley

We were interested to see the paper (PDF 75K) “An audit of adverse drug reactions to aqueous cream in children with atopic eczema” (PJ, 29 November, p747). In the study, an irritant reaction occurred in 56.3 per cent of children with atopic eczema when aqueous cream was used as an emollient, compared with only 17.8 per cent of children using all other emollients.

This is of serious concern to the Skin Care Campaign (SCC) and provides research evidence of a problem of which we have been aware anecdotally for several years.

Reports to the SCC suggest that many health care professionals are not aware either that aqueous cream used as an emollient causes such irritant reactions or that such irritant reactions are frequently a cause of non-compliance with agreed disease management regimens.

We are sometimes asked which emollient we would recommend. The answer is that we cannot recommend any particular treatment. People’s skins vary and different people react differently to different treatments. People with eczema and related conditions tend to have very sensitive skin, and not every product is suited to every patient. Some people will need a range of treatments for different degrees of dry skin, different body sites, different social situations, to encourage compliance and reduce topical steroid use, to address personal preference issues, and on occasion to avoid contact hypersensitivity or other irritant side-effects. And needs may change over time.

If a patient dislikes a treatment, he or she may not use it, which undermines the treatment regimen and is wasteful of National Health Service resources. It is therefore important that the widest possible range of treatments — including a wide range of emollients — should be available. It is important also that people with skin diseases should be given every opportunity to try a variety of emollients to find the ones that suit them best.

The SCC is an umbrella organisation representing the interests of all people with skin diseases in the United Kingdom (www.skincarecampaign.org).

These views are endorsed unreservedly by the British Association of Dermatologists, the Primary Care Dermatology Society and the British Dermatological Nursing Group.

Peter Lapsley
Chief Executive
Skin Care Campaign
www.skincarecampaign.org

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (MHRA leaflet)
Next Topic (CPD)

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal