Home > PJ (current issue) > News / Daily News | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7280 p834
20/27 December 2003

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary

Related websites
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (www.ashp.org)


US pharmacists to be paid for reviews

Older Americans will get help paying for drugs

Pharmacists in the United States are to be reimbursed for providing patient medication reviews under new Medicare legislation that became law in the US on 8 December. It will result in pharmacists in the US receiving payment for a non-supply related function for the first time.

Under the new scheme, pharmacists will be able to provide medication reviews for selected patients when this is recommended by a patient’s doctor. Patients eligible will include those with chronic conditions such as diabetes, asthma, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and heart failure.

Pharmacists will compete with other health care professionals to provide these services. Kathleen Cantwell, director of federal affairs for the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) said that the next goal was to achieve federal “provider” status for clinical services, which would indicate that pharmacists provide a unique service other professionals cannot deliver.

Dr Dan Ashby, president of ASHP, said: “For the first time, pharmacists — who are medication use experts — will be paid to manage drug therapies. This is an incredibly important step in ensuring that [people over the age of 65 years] who take multiple medications do so safely.”

In the future, ASHP also hopes to see pharmacists being reimbursed for disease detection and screening for diabetes and cardiovascular problems.

Medicare is the federal health service for people over the age of 65 years (seniors) in the US. One of the main changes of the new legislation will be to reduce and cap the amount patients have to pay for prescription medicines. A prescription drug scheme will be established from 2006. Under this, patients would pay around $250 (£147) for an annual medicines policy.

The government would cover up to 75 per cent of the cost of medicines up to an annual limit of around $3,600, beyond which it would cover 95 per cent of the cost. Low-income seniors would pay only a small fee for each item. This scheme could cost the government up to $400bn over 10 years.

Pressure from the pharmaceutical industry has prevented the federal government from negotiating lower prices. Increasing parallel importation of cheaper products from Canada, however, has raised awareness among Americans that they pay more for their drugs than most other people in the world. — Gareth Jones, editor, Hospital Pharmacist.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal