Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7282 p52
17 January 2004

This article
Reprint
Photocopy

 

PDF* 90K

Letters

  Statin switch
  Dispensing
  Packaging
  Amateur radio
  Reciprocity
  Onlooker
  The Charter
  The Journal


Letters to the Editor

Statin switch

Pharmacy is willing, but participation must be on realistic terms

From Mr P. Jenkins, FRPharmS

The latest large public health initiative involves the reclassification of simvastatin from prescription-only supply to pharmacy (PJ, 3/10 January, p8). Just taking a tablet is not enough, however, because healthy

lifestyles must be embraced, and that is what public health is all about.

It is intended that pharmacists will be widely involved in the initiative. They are to be part of the induction process, then help in monitoring for compliance because it is essential that patients be motivated to persist with the treatment. They will also supply the statins.

This is a unique initiative and can give indications of pharmacy’s possible future role in the NHS, since the Government’s real intentions towards the profession can be determined from how this project is presented.

The pharmacist’s induction and monitoring roles will have to be funded — and funded at a proper level, not on the cheap but out of new money like the new roles for GPs. Another question arises over who will pay for the drugs each month. Making them P indicates patients will be expected to pay. Patients told they need long-term medication that they will have to pay for themselves might think twice, especially as the less affluent will probably have no tradition of paying for prescriptions. Will the pharmacist be expected to talk them into, and check on, long-term monthly purchases? And what will be the cost? What is a realistic charge to the patient for medicine and back-up?

Pharmacy is willing to participate and contribute, as ever, but it must be on realistic terms. Our negotiators know what is required and although this year’s offer indicates little goodwill by the Government the position with a new project is different. We could say “no” to the whole thing if terms are not acceptable and make it clear that, like the doctors, we value ourselves — and so, too, must the DoH, if it really wants the plan to succeed.

Peter Jenkins
Cardiff

Send your letter to The Editor

Next Topic (Dispensing)

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal