Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7282 p48
17 January 2004

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary

Related websites
ABPI: The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (more)


Medicine adverts appeals process clarified

Rules covering the way in which pharmaceutical companies can appeal against complaints about their promotional activities have been clarified by the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority.

Companies are reminded that appeals need to be lodged within 10 working days of notification of an adverse ruling by the authority. Documents submitted to support an appeal need to highlight new information and not merely repeat points discussed in the original complaint. In addition, it restated that a complaint of “bringing the industry into disrepute” is reserved for the most serious cases, normally involving inappropriate financial payments, threats to patient safety or repeated breaches of the code of practice.

Disease awareness campaigns were among the complaints dealt with by the PMCPA and reported in its quarterly review. Pfizer complained about information about the Lilly Icos product Cialis (tadalafil) which appeared on the NetDoctor website, saying that it promoted a prescription medicine to the public. Lilly said that it did not have editorial control over the website and the complaint failed.

The Stepwise campaign, run by Novartis to raise awareness of fungal nail infections, was also cleared of promoting a prescription medicine, Lamisil (terbinafine), despite being criticised by the BMJ.

The Sunday Herald was also unsuccessful in complaining about an obesity awareness campaign run by Roche.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal