Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7284 p113
31 January 2004

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary

Related websites
The Lancet (www.thelancet.com)


Traditional dosing strategy for asthma challenged

Doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroids does not seem to be an effective way to prevent asthma exacerbations.

In a study published in The Lancet, Tim Harrison and colleagues from City Hospital, Nottingham, challenge the use of this intervention when asthma control deteriorates (2004;363:271).

They asked 390 patients deemed to be at risk of asthma exacerbations to use an additional steroid inhaler (active or placebo) if their morning peak flow fell by 15 per cent or if their daytime symptoms worsened. Patients used the study inhaler for 14 days in addition to their usual treatment and were monitored for subsequent use of oral prednisolone.

During the year-long study, the researchers found that around 12 per cent of patients went on to need oral prednisolone whether or not they had received increased inhaled steroid therapy.

“Doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroid led to a small reduction in the mean maximum fall in peak flow. There was no difference, however, in the lowest peak flow recorded, rise in symptom scores, or highest symptom score recorded when compared with remaining on the same dose,” say the researchers. Furthermore, doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroid had no effect on the time taken for peak flow or symptom scores to return to the baseline values.

The researchers suggest several reasons why the intervention was ineffective at preventing exacerbations — that perhaps a doubling of the steroid dose was an inadequate increase, or that the onset of action of inhaled steroids may be too slow compared with the rapid deterioration in asthma control.

Anna Murphy, consultant respiratory pharmacist, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, told The Journal: “We know that steroid inhalers have a flat dose-response curve and there is little benefit for most patients in increasing the steroid dose above 800µg of beclometasone or equivalent. Steroid inhalers also have a slow onset of action which makes them a poor candidate for acute management of asthma.”

She added that before the latest guidelines were published by the British Thoracic Society and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (PJ, 1 February 2003, p141) it was common practice to increase the dose of inhaled steroids if the peak flow fell by 20–30 per cent. “In practice, many GPs are confused by the new BTS/SIGN guidelines and are unsure what to do for an exacerbation. I know many GPs still recommend the doubling of the dose. Although this may be ineffective, they feel they have treated the patient. The National Asthma Campaign is supporting a study to look at increasing the dose by at least five times to see if this helps.”

Ms Murphy added that recent data for Symbicort (budesonide/formoterol fumarate) have shown that flexible dosing, when patients alter doses themselves, reduces exacerbations, a finding that contradicts the data from the latest study.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal