Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7285 p144
7 February 2004

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary

Related websites
Annals of Internal Medicine abstract (more)


Higher doses of aspirin needed to reduce risk of colorectal adenoma

Taking aspirin over the short- or long-term can reduce the risk for colorectal adenoma by 25 per cent, say researchers, but the greatest protective effect is seen at substantially higher doses than those currently recommended for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

A cohort of women enrolled in the US nurses’ health study and who underwent lower endoscopy between 1980 and 1998 was studied for self-reported aspirin intake and incidence of colorectal adenoma. Of the 27,077 women considered to be at average risk, 1,368 cases of adenoma of the distal colon and rectum were confirmed.

The researchers found that compared with non-regular aspirin users, regular users, defined as those taking two or more tablets per week had a lower risk for distal colorectal adenoma (relative risk 0.75, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.66–0.84).

This apparent benefit was substantially greater with increasing dose of aspirin. Women who took the equivalent of 0.5 to 1.5 standard aspirin tablets per week had a relative risk of 0.8 (CI 0.70–0.93), whereas women who used more than 14 tablets per week had a relative risk of 0.49 (CI 0.36–0.65). This dose relationship was found to be significant for both regular short-term users (<=5 years) and long-term users (>5 years). Increasing the duration of aspirin use was not found to reduce the risk.

The researchers say that these findings may have clinical implications related to potential adverse effects associated with prolonged use of aspirin. They suggest that thorough evaluation of the risks and benefits of routine aspirin use at doses not previously considered is needed before aspirin can be recommended for chemoprevention in the general adult population (Annals of Internal Medicine 2004;140:157).

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal