Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7285 p143
7 February 2004

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary


Pharmacy advice in the Which? spotlight again

More private advice areas like these are needed within pharmacies, says Which?

Advice given in community pharmacies is unsatisfactory in four out of 10 cases, the Consumers' Association says, having sent its undercover researchers into pharmacies for the fourth time in 10 years.

The Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s President, Gill Hawksworth, said at the Council meeting this week that the Society has asked Which? for details of the pharmacies visited. “We should aim to help the pharmacists involved, review what happened and identify how they can improve their practice,” she said. “It is important not to turn this into a witch hunt.” However, a spokesman for Which? told The Journal that while further details of the findings would be provided to the Society, it was not going to release individual pharmacy names “because the research is indicative of a broader problem”.

What Which? asked about

St John’s wort Pharmacy staff were expected to spot the potential interaction with the contraceptive pill.

Emergency contraception Responses were judged on privacy and information.

Diarrhoea If asked, researchers revealed that they had recently visited Malaysia. They should have been told to see a GP.

Low-dose aspirin Levels of risk and basis for self-treatment were measured.

Previous Which? reports on pharmacy advice and sales

The February 2004 issue of Which? magazine is the fourth in 10 years to carry critical reports about advice given in community pharmacies. In June 1994 (PJ, 4 June 1994, p767) and January 1996 (PJ, 6 January 1996, p8), Consumers’ Association researchers asked by name for medicines such as Tagamet (cimetidine) and Canesten (clotrimazole) that had recently been switched from prescription only to pharmacy status. Both reports said that not enough advice was given at the time of sale and that potential interactions were not picked up. The association called for a halt to further POM-to-P switches. The April 1999 report (PJ, 3 April 1999, p454) used similar scenarios but in this case it was pharmacy assistants who were more strongly criticised for the advice they gave than pharmacists.

The traveller’s diarrhoea scenario has been used in all of the reports and it has generally been the one in which pharmacists and their staff performed worst. Terry Maguire, vice-chairman of PharmacyHealthLink, told The Journal that if the actors carrying out the scenarios were not showing signs of have been abroad recently, and were not known to pharmacy staff, then prompts to ask about overseas travel might be missed.

The issue attracted widespread media interest and the Society’s director of practice and quality improvement, David Pruce, was interviewed for numerous national television and radio stations in response to the article. Dr Hawksworth also gave interviews for BBC radio programmes.

For the February issue of Which? magazine, a team of 12 researchers visited 84 pharmacies in England, Scotland and Wales during October last year. These included branches of national multiples, supermarket pharmacies and independents. Four scenarios were acted out (see Panel) and the responses measured against model answers given by a panel of two academics and one community pharmacist.

Overall, 35 of the visits were judged to have resulted in unsatisfactory advice being given, 19 satisfactory and 30 good. Multiple pharmacies tended to have similar levels of performance, each having just under half of their visits rated as good. However, of 19 visits to independents, only three were rated as good and 12 were unsatisfactory.

Which? calls the results worrying. It says that too many pharmacists were tucked away in the dispensary, dealing with prescriptions, although it notes that changes in the new pharmacy contract may improve this. Concerns about lack of privacy within pharmacies when advice was being given were also raised, particularly for sensitive subjects such as emergency hormonal contraception.

Four online pharmacies (Academy Health, Allcures, Boots and Pharmacy2u) are also criticised in the report for failing to provide additional information. “It’s clear that websites aren’t a proper substitute for a face-to-face consultation,” Which? says.

Comment, p142
Pharmacists need more support and better incentives to improve public health advice, p143

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal