|
· Which? report
· Medicines in children
· Community pharmacy
· Minor ailments service
· Branded generics
· Emergency contraception
· Workforce academy
· CPD
· The Register
· The Journal
Letters to the Editor
|
CPD
Answers, please
From Ms K. Johnson, MRPharmS
How much are our fees going to rise in order to pay for the assessment
of our continuing professional development and, presumably, the quality
assurance of such assessment? Has this been evaluated and where are the
figures? Will we get to see some proof of the assessors’ abilities?
Who is assessing the assessors’ CPD, if they are pharmacists? Will
we get some ongoing feedback on their continuing capabilities to assess
us?
Karen Johnson
Redhill, Surrey
| |
ROBERT DEWDNEY, head of education division, Royal Pharmaceutical
Society, responds:
If the Council decides to add the marginal cost
of evaluation and feedback to the fixed costs of the CPD system,
then fees would rise of the order of £5 per annum. Of course
there is the option of absorbing this cost and cutting other activities.
Evaluation and feedback have been piloted in three exercises over
the past three years. Records of over 500 pharmacists have been
addressed, using pharmacist and non-pharmacist evaluators. This
work, undertaken
jointly with the department of applied statistics of the University
of Reading, will be published in due course.
A central feature of the work has been evaluating the evaluators
as much, indeed at this stage more than, evaluating pharmacists’ CPD
records. We envisage and are building into the system ongoing quality
assurance of evaluators. A proportion
of CPD records will, unbeknown to them, go to all evaluators and will be the
basis for “remedial” work with those outside a reasonable consensus
group and, if that is not successful, being dropped. Present evaluation criteria
are Appendix 6 to the CPD “Plan and record”, which 17,000 pharmacists
have received already. “Plan and record” can be found here |
|