Home > PJ (current issue) > News Feature | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7289 p274
6 March 2004

This article
Reprint
Photocopy

 

PDF* 45K

News feature

Opportunities for pharmacy implicit in latest Wanless report on public health

Naomi Kempner reports on the part pharmacists can play in improving the country's health as envisaged in the Wanless report published last week


Public health issues

Important public health issues illustrated in the Wanless report include:

· Smoking
· Health inequalities
· Salt intake
· Obesity
· Physical activity
· Falls

“Securing good health for the whole population: Final report” is available on the Treasury website.

Submissions from pharmacy can now be made on the Department of Health’s consultation on public health (see p266).

Despite the scant mention of pharmacy, a long-awaited report on securing the nation’s health could have a “significant impact on community pharmacy”. So says Geof Rayner, chairman of the UK Public Health Association and director of Pharmacy HealthLink.

The report, “Securing good health for the whole population: Final report”, was produced for the Prime Minister, the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Health Secretary by Derek Wanless (ex-chief executive, NatWest Bank Group). It highlights the role of community pharmacy in the management of chronic conditions. But it omits pharmacists as examples of primary care staff with a public health role.

However, Dr Rayner told The Journal that the first Wanless report published in 2002 had already acknowledged the benefits of engaging the public through community pharmacy. In his opinion, this second report concentrated on the general context of engaging the public rather than the exact infrastructure. He encouraged pharmacists not to be disappointed by the report, which, he thought, could have a “significant bearing” on community pharmacy’s role in public health.

The “fully engaged” scenario

Before the 2002 Spending Review, Derek Wanless was asked to assess the resources required to ensure that the NHS could provide a publicly funded, high quality service on the basis of clinical need.

The review recommended a significantly larger share of national income for health care, with effective use of resources. The least expensive scenario (cheaper by £30bn compared with the most expensive), which also delivered better health outcomes, was a “fully engaged” scenario in which the level of public engagement in relation to health is high, life expectancy improves beyond current forecasts, health status increases and the health service is responsive and cost efficient.

The new report provides an update of the challenges in implementing the fully engaged scenario.

The report says that the NHS needs to be transformed from a “national sickness service” which treats disease, to a national health service, which focuses on prevention. Mr Wanless’s vision is of individuals “fully engaged” in becoming responsible for their own health and that of their children, well supported in making better decisions to promote health. The report illustrates key threats to the nation’s future health: smoking (see p275), diet and obesity, lack of physical activity, falls and health inequalities.

These threats need to be tackled now, Mr Wanless says. Another priority is the organisation and funding of research to ensure which approaches are effective and what spending can be justified.

“The role of community pharmacists will need to be developed to expand overall capacity in the increasingly important management of chronic conditions and take pressure off traditionally skilled people”, says the report summary.

Proactive role

A spokesman from HM Treasury said that the “fully engaged” scenario envisaged by Derek Wanless would require a proactive role from pharmacists in terms of engaging the public in their own health, enabling them to manage chronic disease, and providing access to preventive health care.

“The profession can also contribute to improving health literacy by offering an additional channel for high quality information presented on a user-friendly basis, which will encourage the public to seek advice from pharmacists as a recognised and routine part of the range of public health services available at local level.”

Pharmacists are mentioned again specifically in a case study on falls, “a major cause of disability and mortality in the over-75s”. The report says that effective fall prevention and treatment highlights the importance of an integrated approach between health and social care including medical, nursing, pharmacy and social services.

Pharmacists are not mentioned in a chapter on the delivery of public health, although health visitors, school nurses, practice nurses, midwives, district nurses, GPs and dietitians are all cited as having a role in primary care in relation to public health. The report calls for a co-ordinated approach to developing a “public health workforce” and to identify competencies for new roles, eg, “smoking cessation officers”.

Primary care trusts are identified as playing a significant role in a fully engaged scenario, helping individuals to stay healthy. The electronic patient record is cited as an infrastructure for mapping out the local prevalence of disease and lifestyle risks and will allow enhanced targeting of disease management.

The Government, it suggests, should develop a consistent set of national objectives for the key risk factors. Primary care trusts and local authorities should then agree joint local targets.

Hemant Patel, secretary, North-East London Local Pharmaceutical Committee, suggests that pharmacy involvement in public health requires links with local development plans and local public health reports. The pharmacy role early in care pathways must be identified, be accessible and of good quality, with evidence for its efficacy, he adds.

“Think about linking primary prevention with existing services (eg, dispensing) and secondary prevention measures. For example, giving advice on diet and exercise for primary prevention in CHD, in tandem with dispensing aspirin for secondary prevention.

“With medicines management in between, we could develop a one-stop centre for health care,” he adds. Mr Patel also emphasises the importance for pharmacy of understanding the difference between public health and health promotion.

Eileen Neilson, head of policy development, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, echoes these ideas: “The report highlights the need to expand the role of community pharmacists in medicines management for chronic conditions. This was a major point in the Society’s submission of evidence to the review. We also highlighted the dearth of evidence on the cost-effectiveness of interventions such as medicines management, and the report confirms this.

“There are now opportunities to join with other organisations in recommending the building of an appropriate research infrastructure for public health interventions, and specifically to call for more research funding to evaluate pharmacy-led interventions.”


  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal