Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7289 p270
6 March 2004

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary

Related websites
DoH consultations (more)
Consultation document: Regulation of healthcare staff in England and Wales (PDF 120K)


Technicians an exception in regulation proposals

Pharmacy support staff should not be independently regulated, the Society says

Pharmacy technicians are to be one of only two assistant professional groups to be regulated by their parent professions.

This is clear from plans to widen the range of health care providers to come under statutory regulation which have been published by the Government. Consultation runs from 2 March until 2 July.

The course favoured by the Government is regulation through a Health Occupations Committee of the Health Professions Council. A second option is that regulation should fall to the regulatory bodies of the professions for which the assistants primarily work. This is already the case for dental therapists and hygienists, who have been regulated by the General Dental Council since 1986. Consultation on a similar approach for pharmacy technicians will start later this year. This option has been rejected for other assistants.

Regulation predominantly by the HPC is expected to keep registration fees for assistant staff down to £20–£25 a year.

Launching consultation on the proposals, which apply to England and Wales only, Health Minister John Hutton said that regulation will reassure patients that they are being treated by staff with appropriate skills, who are subject to codes of conduct and who meet practice standards.

Staff groups that the Government believes should be regulated include all those whose members have direct impact on patient care. Direct impact means face-to-face provision of prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care, sometimes involving clinical judgement. It can also include technical analysis and scientific support involving patients’ body samples. Examples include health care assistants and assistant practitioners, such as radiography assistants and pathology assistants.

The proposal is that such staff should be subject to statutory regulation to ensure that those who fall short of required standards can be reviewed and, if necessary, removed from practice.

Separate consultation on regulatory proposals for Scotland and Northern Ireland are to be made later, but are expected to recognise the desirability of a common approach throughout the UK.

Philip Green, director of education and registration at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society said: “The expectation that the Government would at some future date require health care support workers to be regulated was a driver in the Society’s decisions to seek enabling powers to register pharmacy technicians and to regulate other pharmacy support staff groups through professional requirements covering their training and competence.”

The Society’s view is that pharmacy support staff are all involved in practices that are dependent upon or linked to those of pharmacists and that these support staff should not come within the remit of the current Health Professions Council. This view is endorsed by a number of key stakeholders within pharmacy.


  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal