Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7290 p312
13 March 2004

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary


Omapatrilat remains on file for regulatory approval as new trial broadly favours risk-benefit ratio

Indications for omapatrilat — a new antihypertensive agent being developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb — continue to be investigated while the company evaluates its options for the drug, following a new trial.

Omapatrilat inhibits both angiotensin converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase and has been shown to be an effective antihypertensive. In 2002, the US Food and Drug Administration declined an application to license omapatrilat — because of concerns over related angio-oedema — and called for further trials.

The latest trial aimed to resemble clinical practice more closely than previous studies and has revealed that its risk-benefit ratio “appears favourable in appropriate patients”. However, the study shows that black people and smokers might be more at risk of serious side effects than others.

The 24-week OCTAVE study (omapatrilat cardiovascular treatment versus enalapril), funded by BMS, involved 25,302 patients with untreated or uncontrolled hypertension. Subjects were randomised to omapatrilat 10mg or enalapril 5mg titrated over six weeks to 80mg for omapatrilat and 40mg for enalapril, if needed. At weeks eight and 16, other antihypertensives could be added to achieve target blood pressure.

At week eight, omapatrilat reduced systolic blood pressure 3.6mmHg more than enalapril and was associated with less use of adjunctive therapy by week 24 (19 per cent versus 27 per cent). Subjects on omapatrilat were more likely to reach their target blood pressure regardless of co-morbid conditions or whether the drug was used as initial, replacement, or add-on therapy. However, angio-oedema was more frequent with the newer agent (2.17 per cent versus 0.68 per cent with enalapril).

The researchers comment that the burden of disease associated with inadequate treatment of hypertension is substantial. Although airways compromise resulting from angio-oedema occurred in 1.6 per 10,000 patients treated, life-threatening cardiovascular events occurred at a rate of 100 to 300 per 10,000 patients per year, depending on underlying cardiovascular risk. Thus omapatrilat might be of particular benefit in patients with blood pressure that is difficult to control and at increased cardiovascular risk.

In black patients and smokers special caution would need to be taken because of the increased rates of angio-oedema in these groups (American Journal of Hypertension 2004; 17:103).

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal