|
|
| Society summary |
Retention fee payments: some questions answeredPhilip Green, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Deputy Secretary and Registrar and Director of Education and Registration, answers some questions about the Society's new system for collecting the annual retention fees from members and pharmacy owners Why did we have to change the payment process for retention fees? What was wrong with the old system? In August 2003, the Society’s Council took the decision to outsource the process of collecting the annual retention and fee collection. The old system involved an increasingly unmanageable workload on the in-house staff, which had resulted in an inefficient service that was inconvenient to members. It seemed sensible, therefore, to employ an organisation for which the collection of large volumes of payments and form processing were core business. Which outside agencies are involved and why? The Society approached its bankers, The Royal Bank of Scotland, for advice and support in relation to the annual return and fee collection cycle. The bank introduced the Society to Atos Origin, a key partner organisation for the bank. Atos Origin is one of Europe’s largest information technology services companies, with 47,000 staff and revenues of €5bn. The Society contracted with the bank, agreeing to place the work with Atos Origin. How many fees have been collected so
far? Ninety-four per cent of members had paid their fees as at 5 March,
a significant improvement on fee collection over previous years. The
vast majority of members had paid their fees and made annual returns
by the close of January and the Society will benefit from the consequential
improvement to cash flow during the first quarter of the year. On 5
March, statutory demands for payment were issued to those members who
had not attempted to make payment. The number of demands issues was
about half the number issued in 2003 figures. It was recently reported that there were a few teething problems
with the new system. Can you explain what these were and why they happened? As with any new system, there have been difficulties. Initially, despite
the Society’s best efforts and extensive planning, the performance
of Atos has proved disappointing across the range of complex processes
required to distribute forms, collect fees, process payments and update
the Society’s records. Specifically, some members did not receive
the original paperwork in good time and some have received reminders
to pay when in fact they may have already done so. The Society can only
apologise to those members. So what is being done to help avoid in the future the problems that have occurred in the first year of the new system? The Society worked hard in preparing for the new system and, through the course of the past three months, has revised and honed its processes hand-in-hand with its partners. No system is infallible and the Society can only work towards minimising the problems in the future, but it is confident the lessons learned during the 2004 retention fee cycle have put it in a stronger position to offer an even better service in 2005. Overall, what can members expect next year? The success of online card payments has added weight to the Society’s intention to investigate a range of other online services. For those members who have not found the new system easy or customer friendly this year, the Society would expect things to run more smoothly in 2005 |
Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us