Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7294 p439
10 April 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Menorrhagia treatment: surgery may eventually be needed

Many women taking hormone treatment or using the intrauterine device Mirena for menorrhagia, rather than undergoing hysterectomy, will eventually need surgery for their condition, two recent trials suggest.

A US trial randomly assigned 63 women with menorrhagia to undergo hysterectomy or medical treatment with oestrogen and/or progesterone and/or a prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor. The women had suffered abnormal bleeding for a median of four years and had been dissatisfied with medroxyprogesterone treatment.

At six months the surgical group had greater improvement in health-related quality of life compared with those on medication. They showed improvements in mental health scores as well as symptoms and overall health. By the end of the two-year study, 53 per cent of women in the medicine group had requested and received a hysterectomy. The women who continued medical treatment also reported some improvements. By the end of the study, most differences between the groups were no longer statistically significant (JAMA 2004;291:1447).

The other trial, a five-year study in Finland, randomly assigned 236 women, newly referred to hospital with menorrhagia, to either hysterectomy or treatment with the intrauterine progestogen-only system (Mirena). After five years of follow up the two groups did not differ substantially in terms of health-related quality of life.

Although 42 per cent of women in the Mirena group eventually underwent hysterectomy, the authors say that costs remained substantially lower than in the surgery group (ibid p1456).

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal