Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7297 p541
1 May 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 80K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Indemnity insurance
· CPD
· Drug nomenclature
· NHS pension scheme
· Ampoule labelling
· The profession
· Electronic prescribing
· Canvassing
· The Society


Letters to the Editor

CPD

Funding for the future?

From Mrs A. Morant, MRPharmS

Yet again pharmacy has drawn the short straw with respect to funding. At the same time as the Government wishes to increase the role of pharmacists, it is not providing adequate funding. This is exacerbated by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society insisting on mandatory continuing professional development.

Wishing to keep up to date, I have been attending Centre for Pharmacy Postgraduate Education courses almost since their inception. I have found these courses of great value, since apart from just accruing hours of attendance credits, I almost invariably have had to call upon the knowledge gained. Unfortunately, the CPPE has now informed me that owing to lack of funds the number of permitted courses has been reduced from 12 to eight, even though “web-based learning events will be excluded from this count”.

This small olive branch is, in fact, worthless. After all, unless a pharmacy has either a spare telephone line or broadband, one would be tying up the telephone for an unacceptably long period. It would be reprehensible for an individual pharmacist to monopolise a resource provided for the benefit of the business as a whole, particularly so in my case because I am a locum pharmacist. A similar issue applies to home use with the additional caveat that one would like to be free to enjoy a home life away from pharmacy, even though our “masters” do not appear to think so. Furthermore, how can one give due care to either dispensing or learning if one is constantly having to switch between them? Can you think of anything more likely to result in dispensing errors?

Many pharmacists attend CPPE courses, but there is a larger number who do not. If the CPPE is already having difficulties meeting existing demands, what will occur when CPD becomes mandatory, unless there is a massive injection of funds and, possibly, a total restructure?

Annette Morant
Edgware, Middlesex

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Indemnity insurance)
Next Topic (Drug nomenclature)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal