CRC closures a disaster, say design researchers
Traditional child-resistant containers (CRCs) are a design disaster, with most adults having to struggle to open them, according to a study publicised this week in the journal of the Engineering
and Physical Sciences Research Council.
The study was carried out by Belinda Winder and colleagues from the packaging
research group at the University of Sheffield. They wanted to know what
consumers thought of CRCs and undertook a diary study with 250 consumers
and a questionnaire with 100 volunteers aged 20 to 84 years. Ninety per
cent of those in the latter study reported difficulties opening CRCs
and evidence suggested that, by the age of 50, the average person could
expect to have frequent problems opening this type of packaging.
According to the researchers, the main problem related to the physical
strength required to open CRCs. They said that new designs were urgently
needed to remedy the design shortcomings and to prevent patients from
decanting their medicines into other containers that could be more accessible
to children.
Dr Winder says that CRCs should be based on a cognitive, rather than
physical key. Opening should not rely on physical strength but should
require one or two physically undemanding actions that are too sophisticated
for young children to chance upon by accident.
The EPSRC’s journal describes how consultant Factory Design has
used this concept to design new CRCs. The “tri” design requires
three equidistant buttons to be pressed simultaneously to unscrew the
top of a spheroid-shaped container. The “slide” design, for
a monitored dosage system, involves three buttons which must be aligned
in the correct way for a container to be opened. The “poke” pack
is essentially a long tube with an interior spring-loaded catch that
can only be released by pressure from an adult-length finger.
Patents on these products have been filed by the Faraday Packaging Partnership,
which is looking to grant licences to manufacturers. |