Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7298 p587
8 May 2004


Society summary

 Law and Ethics Bulletin

An occasional feature, prepared in the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s Professional Standards Directorate, to highlight problems and inquiries currently being handled

Law and Ethics Bulletin, 2001 to present
See also Good Practice Points, 2003 to present

• Minimising the risk of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE)
• Ensuring accuracy in the supply of the balance of a part-dispensed prescription


Minimising the risk of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE)

The Unlicensed Medicinal Products for Human Use (Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies) (Safety) Regulations 2003, which came into force on 30 July 2003, regulate the import and marketing of unlicensed medicinal products for human use to minimise the risk posed by transmissible spongiform encephalopathies.

Unlicensed medicinal products must be manufactured in accordance with the TSE guidelines, for which the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency is the enforcement authority.

Some medicines are excluded from these Regulations, and the main products that apply to pharmacists are those manufactured under Section 10 of the Medicines Act 1968. The exemption from licensing under this section includes the preparation and dispensing, by or under the supervision of a pharmacist, of products in response to patient symptoms, or in accordance with a prescription, or extemporaneous products and “nostrums”.

Although medicines manufactured by pharmacists under the Section 10 exemption are exempt from the TSE Regulations, pharmacists have a professional requirement to comply. The Society’s inspectors will monitor pharmacies to ensure that standards are met.

Particular areas of risk in the supply of these unlicensed products include the use of products that have been directly imported into the pharmacy, the use of uncontrolled starting materials obtained from wholesalers, the use of capsule shells or other materials that have been in the pharmacy for some time, and the use of raw materials labelled as “not for medicinal use”.

Pharmacists need to ensure that steps are taken to reduce the risk of TSE in starting materials. This may include obtaining all starting materials from approved manufacturers and suppliers. The MHRA has stated that where conventional starting materials are used the actual manufacturer needs to be identified rather than the supplier. The pharmacist needs to be satisfied that the manufacturer has continued to manage the risk of TSE transmission, and has obtained a certificate of approval from the European Directorate for Quality of Medicines. If the starting material is of animal origin or has been exposed to risk of cross contamination, there should be clear assurance that the materials do not pose a risk. Records of evidence of compliance have to be kept for five years.

The Regulations are available from the Government’s Statutory Instruments website. Information is also available from the MHRA (tel 020 7084 2000; or as a PDF file (190K))

Back to Top

Ensuring accuracy in the supply of the balance of a part-dispensed prescription

Pharmacists are reminded of the importance of ensuring that, when there has been insufficient stock to dispense a prescription in its entirety at the time of first dispensing, the balance of the prescription is dispensed accurately.

A legible owing slip detailing the name and quantity of the medicine outstanding must be provided on each occasion and a record kept in the pharmacy. If the owing slip is computer generated, pharmacists should be particularly vigilant to ensure that the correct product code is entered and subsequently the correct product is printed on the balance slip. Pharmacists are advised to double check the owing slip produced, so as to prevent any error by pharmacists who dispense the balance owing.

Where balances are dispensed when the pharmacist no longer has the original prescription, a suitable procedure should be in place to verify what was ordered. This may include preparing a photocopy of the prescription before its submission to the prescription pricing bureau, so that the owing and directions can be checked against the copy.

Further guidance appears in the revised Code of Ethics, Part 3, paragraph 4.1(h).

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal