Woeful lack of evidence for gout treatments, says DTB
There is a “woeful” lack of evidence to guide treatment or prophylaxis for gout, particularly with regard to choice of drug or doses, according to the latest issue of Drug
and Therapeutics Bulletin. Its
editor Joe Collier said: “It is astonishing that we know so little
about how best to treat the common (and very painful) condition gout.
The drugs used are old, so there is no drive to do the necessary research.
This is an unacceptable position and needs remedying.”
The DTB advises that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents are a standard
first-line treatment for acute gout. But it adds that there are few randomised
controlled trials to guide the choice of agent. “What evidence
there is suggests there is no difference in efficacy or tolerability
between any of the NSAIDs.” Although colchicine is an alternative
drug for patients who cannot take an NSAID, its side effects of diarrhoea
and vomiting are common. A reduced dose of 500µg up to three times
daily may avoid these effects. Paracetamol or an opiate such as codeine
are effective and could be used alone or in combination with an NSAID
or other treatments.
“Deciding when to start lifelong prophylactic therapy presents
another problem in the management of gout,” again with a lack of
guiding evidence, says the bulletin. Although some clinicians advise
that patients
who have two or more attacks per year should be offered prophylactic
therapy, in practice the decision is often left to the patient.
The DTB adds that, although allopurinol and sulfinpyrazone lower serum
uric acid concentrations, it can find no published randomised controlled
studies showing a reduction in the likelihood of having attacks of gout.
There are also no published controlled trials which examine the effect
of lifestyle changes on the frequency of gout. However, the bulletin
says there is some evidence that modifying body weight and diet can influence
serum uric acid concentrations and possibly help prevent attacks (2004;42:37). |