Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7301 p659
29 May 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary

Related websites
Save Our Society (www.saveoursociety.org.uk)


Mixed reaction to Council election victory of all SOS candidates

Pharmacists have been reacting this week to the election of all seven Save Our Society campaign candidates to the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Council (PJ, 22 May, p629).

Ash Soni, chairman of the National Pharmaceutical Association, said: “It seems to indicate that there is a sense of disillusionment with the previous Council. It is a demonstration of democracy at work.” Mr Soni said that the perception was that people had raised their concerns with the Society and that it had then decided to discount them.

David Sharpe, a past-president of the Society, described the 59.7 per cent of votes cast for SOS candidates as “fairly substantial by any standard”. He said: “As I understand it, the Council has a majority of 13 SOS supporters and sympathisers. One can only presume that there will be some radical changes in the conduct of the Council in future.”

However, Mr Sharpe raised concerns over how the victory was achieved: “This could be a worrying feature of future elections if groups of candidates get together and brand themselves.”

None of the newly elected Council members is from the hospital sector. Tony West, chief pharmacist at Guy’s and St Thomas’ hospital, London, said: “It means that the Council is now unrepresentative of the profession as a whole.” In relation to modernisation of the Society he said: “This puts us back to square one. We need to move forward as a profession and this isn’t going to help.” He added that both the regulatory and professional roles of the Society are now at risk.

The SOS campaign is organising seven candidates to stand in next year’s election.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal