Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / Daily News | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7301 p687
29 May 2004


Society summary


Society asked for fees review

The branch representatives' meeting asked the Society to review the scale of annual fees payable by members and include a fee for non-working members below retirement age that is more commensurate with that payable by those over retirement age.

Pam Copsey (South Cheshire) said that those under retirement age paid £116 a year and those over retirement age paid £22, even though they received the same service from the Society. Most of those who put aside their careers for other commitments wanted to stay in touch with developments in the profession. But £116 a year seemed a bit expensive.

Christine Robinson (South Cheshire), seconding, noted that a review of the fee structure was in train. Supporting the motion would give the Council a clear mandate for change.

Bill Brookes (South Cheshire) said there were people for whom £100 a year was a significant outlay. He paid the lower fee himself but found it strange that members less affluent than him had to pay a higher fee.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal