Home > PJ (current issue) > Leading article | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7302 p694
5 June 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Leading Articles

Partners in practice more
Council in the spotlight more


Partners in practice

Rural GPs and community pharmacists have — traditionally — not always seen eye to eye. Turf wars between dispensing practices and local pharmacies have on occasion ended in tears. However, a development in Devon could help change the rural landscape and be the beginning of the end of ancient animosities between the two professions. Moreover, it could provide a model that has implications for practices in suburban and inner-city areas where pharmacies are thin on the ground and GPs find it difficult to attract professionals to provide pharmaceutical care.

The Chulmleigh practice in Devon has come up with a novel solution to its difficulty in providing pharmacy services for the village since the closure of the local pharmacy following a retirement over five years ago. After a serendipitous exchange between one of the GPs and the local pharmaceutical adviser, the practice invited the adviser to become a fully fledged and equal partner (p700).

This solution has been made practicable, and even desirable, by the new general medical services contract, which, as The Journal has discussed on previous occasions, offers many opportunities for pharmacists because of its emphasis on chronic disease management and associated medicines management issues. Coupled with the new pharmacy contract and related developments, having a pharmacist as an integral part of the primary care team — rather than just someone who appears on a sessional basis — makes financial sense for the practice. For the pharmacist there are risks but, at the moment, they are outweighed by the professional benefits of the contribution that can be made to the range and quality of services on offer, as well as by the recognition of the value and status that the partnership brings personally.

Pharmacists in other parts of Britain who also recognise the contribution they could make should be encouraged to boldly go to their local practice and outline the advantages to the partnership of having a pharmacist in their fold.

Back to Top

Council in the spotlight

Next week, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Council meets for the first time since the election. The first afternoon of business is to be largely devoted to discussion of the six motions being put forward by a Save Our Society representative (p695). Feelings are expected to run high and points of view are likely to be expressed strongly.

Let us hope that members of Council — both new and old — remember that arguments are better made when they are devoid of emotion. Those with an interest in pharmacy’s future will be paying close attention, so let us hope, too, that the Council’s proceedings are not marred by ill-considered comment. Let the day’s decisions be remembered for the quality of the debate as much as the outcome.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal