|
· The Society
· Malaria awareness
· PI insurance
· Statins
· Methadone maintenance
· The Journal
Letters to the Editor
|
Methadone maintenance
British pharmacists should cherish role
From Dr R. Newman, MD
I realise plenty has been said already both for and against pharmacy
dispensing of methadone. However, as an outspoken advocate of strong
reliance on community pharmacists for the treatment of addiction, I must
express my dismay over the letters published in the 6 March issue. All
four commentators clearly express the sentiment that the goal of methadone
maintenance is to achieve total, lasting abstinence. How can professional
pharmacists, active participants in this treatment, be so misinformed?
In the 40 years since Nyswander and Dole first published their observations
on methadone maintenance, the fundamental rationale for the treatment
has been that, for many opiate-dependent individuals, “addiction” is
a medical problem that defies “cure”. Can some achieve and
maintain abstinence without need for ongoing medication? Of course, just
as many (the majority) of people with adult-onset diabetes can overcome
their “dependence” on insulin by compliance with a regimen
of diet, exercise, etc. Your writers, however, view the patients to whom
they administer methadone as failures — precisely because their
physicians have determined that this medication is necessary and appropriate.
It seems likely that the behaviour problems described are at least in
part a response to this pejorative, illogical, contradictory judgement
conveyed by the pharmacist.
In the US, the pharmacist has for almost 100 years been excluded by law
from participating in the care of the disease of addiction. British pharmacists
should cherish the role that they are privileged to play and ensure that
they understand the treatment that they provide.
Robert Newman
Director
Baron Edmond de Rothschild Chemical Dependency Institute,
Beth Israel Medical Centre,
New York City
|