Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 272 No 7303 p727
12 June 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary

Related websites
Charter links (more)


New Council agrees to leave Charter petition with Privy Council pending further discussion this month

Council plans further discussions on modernisation

The new Council of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society has agreed to leave the petition for a new Charter with the Privy Council pending further consideration by Council later this month.

A motion to this effect was unanimously passed at the June Council meeting this week. The motion was one of six proposed by Council member Nicholas Wood that addressed modernisation of the Society (PJ, 5 June, p695).

Following a long debate, it was agreed to amend the motion so that it no longer directed the immediate withdrawal of the old Council’s petition for a new Charter. The amended motion read: “That the Secretary and Registrar be directed to inform the Privy Council forthwith that, without prejudicing the Council’s ability to withdraw its petition, the Council wishes to submit further changes to its draft charter for a new Royal Charter [sic] following further consideration by the Council and members of the Society generally.” The amended motion was passed on the understanding that the Council could still withdraw the petition at a later date.

As a result, some other decisions were delayed and will not be taken until after a Council strategy day about modernisation to be held on 30 June. As a result, three of Mr Wood’s motions (numbers three, four and five) were left lying on the table. They will be considered at a special Council meeting to be held at the end of the strategy day.

Of the remainder, motion two — which requested that a committee is set up to establish the Government’s requirements with regards to the regulatory function of the Society — was passed. However, it was decided that the Society’s office would be asked to research this before the strategy day when it would be decided if a committee was still needed.

Motion six, which addressed the legal action taken by the Save Our Society group, was withdrawn by Mr Wood without debate.

The Council also agreed to leave a motion proposed by Mark Walker, from Oxford, at this year’s annual general meeting of the Society lying on the table. Mr Walker’s motion was a request for the Society to endorse a petition to the Privy Council seeking the rejection of the Council’s draft Charter (PJ, 22 May, p652).

A full report of the Council meeting will appear in next week’s Journal.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal