“Alas, our young affections run to waste”
In Nature for 17 June there is an essay by Melvin Konner, an anthropologist from Atlanta, on the nature of the bonds between humans which we designate by the name “attachment”.
Although bonds of affection have held families together since the dawn of human
time, attachment has only recently become a subject for scientific study. Sigmund
Freud, writes Konner, said a great deal about how the mind handles the topic
of sympathetic attachment, and predicted that “our provisional ideas in
psychology will some day be based on an organic substructure”.
The basic attachment, it has been said, is the link between mother and infant,
something that has developed during centuries of evolution. In all cultures the
typical attachment behaviours, like clinging to a primary care-giver in times
of distress and recognising the essential privilege of that person to relieve
anxiety, becomes powerful during the second half-year of life. It has been observed
that during that phase of infancy the major pathways of the brain’s limbic
system become coated with myelin, which improves the function of those subcortical
circuits that process emotion, together with their nervous connections with the
frontal and cingulate cortex.
In many mammals, though not humans, oxytocin plays a role in maternal responses
to infants. The attachment between males and infants, on the other hand, involves
the activity of vasopressin, which is also a brain neurotransmitter. Experiments
in prairie voles indicate that mating is promoted by vasopressin.
It seems possible that long-term commitment between humans is determined by these
two hormones. Treatment with them might be effective in counteracting the condition
known as “reactive attachment disorder”, which is responsible for
abnormal personal relationships of children who have undergone social trauma
during infancy.
Back to Top
|