Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7308 p83-84
17 July 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 80K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Dispensing
· Natural therapies
· Peak flow meters
· The Society


Letters to the Editor

Peak flow meters

Asthma links

Position clarified

It is the Wright scale that is being replaced by the EN 13826 scale

Position clarified

From Mr B. Garbe

Your News item (PJ, 19 June, p757) about the adoption of the EN 13826 standard peak flow meters to replace the Wright scale peak flow meters currently in the Drug Tariff makes for confusing reading. I would like to put this straight. The position is simple:

· After 1 September, peak flow meters conforming to the EN 13826 standard must be dispensed
· Until 1 September, the existing Wright scale meters must be dispensed
· Wright scale meters will be discontinued after this date

The article said “it is not clear whether Wright meters will continue to be reimbursable on NHS prescription after 1 September”.

This is incorrect. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency device alert document MDA/2004/025 does not leave this ambiguous. Wright scale peak flow meters will not be reimbursable after 1 September.

I have been in discussion and correspondence with both the MHRA and the Prescription Pricing Authority on this subject for many months, and we have been involved for years on the new standard itself.

Vitalograph makes several models of peak flow meter; all conform to the standard EN 13826:2003 unless labelled otherwise. Wright scale devices are labelled “Drug Tariff Specification 51”. Wright scale peak flow meters do not conform to EN 13826.

There will be one exception to the EN 13826 rule after the 1 September. The Drug Tariff will have listed a “low range” peak flow meter which conforms to EN 13826 in every respect except its range of measurement, the scale stopping at 400L/min instead of 800L/min as required by EN 13826. The device will be labelled to this effect and will not be labelled “EN 13826”.

I do hope this clarifies the position.

Bernard Garbe
Managing Director
Vitalograph Ltd


It is the Wright scale that is being replaced by the EN 13826 scale

From Mr J. Bell

I write to express our concerns over the forthcoming change in peak flow meter standard on September 1 (PJ, 19 June, p757).

First, Clement Clarke International Ltd would like to reassure pharmacists that the Mini-Wright brand of peak flow meter will continue to be made available; it is the Wright scale that is being replaced by the EN 13826 scale, and CE compliant Mini-Wrights will be available for reimbursement on September 1.

Secondly, you correctly reported that neither the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency nor the Prescription Pricing Authority has made recommendations on how to manage the change, leaving pharmacists and their wholesalers with numerous questions, and few answers.

The announcement in the Drug Tariff that existing Wright-scale meters would no longer be reimbursed after 1 September has alerted pharmacists to the need to reduce stock to zero by the changeover date. Wholesalers are faced with a larger problem — even a small inventory of, say, 5,000 Wright-scale meters on 31 August will result in a loss of up to £30,000 through stock write-off, unless the manufacturers are willing to take the stock back. And with the whole of Europe changing to the new scale, where are we supposed to sell these Wright-scale meters?

Unless the MHRA, PPA and the Department of Health address all the issues together, Wright-scale peak flow meters will become more and more scarce as the summer goes on.

This situation never needed to arise. Both the MHRA and the PPA were furnished with detailed information about supply chain issues, from manufacturers and wholesalers, with additional comment from relevant professionals involved in asthma care. While the MHRA sought to define the issues and groups who would be affected, the PPA has remained sceptical of any likely supply problems, and has failed to recognise the issues affecting both pharmacists and manufacturers.

Ideally, the authorities should announce a period during which both types of meter will be reimbursed. This will ensure no patient faces a delay in their prescription being filled, and pharmacists and manufacturers can minimise risk of losing hard-earned profit. Since patient safety is not at risk, why can the MHRA, PPA and the DoH not act to accommodate our concerns?

It will soon be too late for the PPA to react, so pharmacists and wholesalers with concerns can gain up-to-date information at www.peakflow.com, or by calling Clement Clarke direct on 01279 414969. The website also carries information on how to convert from one scale to the other — the large number of Wright-scale meters already in common use will ensure the need to convert readings for several years to come.

Jon Bell
Business Development Manager — Inspiratory
Clement Clarke International Ltd

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Natural therapies)
Next Topic (The Society)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal