Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7309 p114-115
24 July 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 75K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Charter ballot
· Violence in pharmacies
· Cupping
· Humour in pharmacy
· Pharmacy education
· Natural therapies
· The Journal


Letters to the Editor

Natural therapies

Surprised at disdain for conventional medicines

From Mr C. Anton and Mr A. R. Cox, MRPharmS

Ian Jackson’s disdain for conventional medicine (PJ, 17 July, p83) is surprising. All conventional medicines supplied in the UK have product licences and the evidence base for their safety, efficacy and quality has been checked, and is kept under review, by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), together with its committees such as the Committee on Safety of Medicines and Subcommittee on Pharmacovigilance. This is not true of the majority of alternative or traditional products available.

It is true that large numbers of patients are harmed by their conventional medicines, with many cases remaining unreported. In a majority of instances these events would have been avoidable with better medicines management systems. 1 However, highlighting the known risks of conventional medicines provides little insight into the efficacy and safety of herbal medicines; we see many reports of such reactions or interactions in this centre.

Even the example of mistletoe Mr Jackson uses as evidence to support his position, does little to back up his general point about herbal medication. Systematic reviews of the efficacy of mistletoe extracts have found the majority of trials to be of poor methodological quality; the one high quality trial reported no difference between the treatment and control groups.2 Of course, standard chemotherapeutic agents are extremely toxic drugs, but mistletoe is not without adverse effects. Hepatitis has been reported in the literature2 and in reports of suspected adverse reactions to the MHRA. Anaphylactic shock has also been reported.3 The latter reaction providing mixed evidence for Mr Jackson’s assertion that mistletoe “works with the body’s immune system rather than against it”.

We urge pharmacists to be vigilant in checking with patients whether they are taking “natural” or “traditional” remedies, to remind them that, just like other drugs, they are not always safe and may cause harm. Pharmacists should complete a Yellow Card if they suspect that any adverse reaction or interaction has occurred.

Christopher Anton
Anthony Cox

West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting

References

1. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18,820 patients. BMJ 2004;329:15–9.

2. Barnes J, Anderson LA, Phillipson JD, editors. Herbal Medicines, 2nd edition. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2002.

3. Hutt N, Kopferschmitt-Kubler, M, Cabalion J, et al. Anaphylactic reactions after therapeutic injection of mistletoe (Viscum Album L.). Allergologia et Immunopathologia 2001;29:201–3.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Pharmacy education)
Next Topic (The Journal)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal