Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7309 p104
24 July 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary

Related websites
Charter links (more)


Members likely to support Charter

Substantial support for the draft new Royal Charter for the Royal Pharmaceutical Society can be expected if a meeting held to consider the matter shows the trend.
Participants in the meeting, organised by Council member Graham Phillips, voted by 20 to 1 in favour of the draft.

Rob Darracott, the Society’s director of corporate and strategic development, said that it was not known what would happen if the members voted to reject the draft Charter. But it was likely that the Government would write more rules into its Health Act Section 60 Order than would otherwise have been the case. This could include setting the composition of the Society’s Council in the Section 60 Order, rather than through the Charter, as at present.

Mr Phillips, who is a leading proponent of the Save Our Society campaign, said that failure of a substantial majority of Society members to support the Charter changes would leave the Society in a real mess. The profession would survive even if members voted against the draft Charter but it would take a long time for the Society to dig itself out of the resulting hole. “If members vote no and we don’t like the resulting Section 60 Order, then we would tell the Government to take regulatory responsibility away from the Society,” Mr Phillips said.

Privy Council consultation The Privy Council could hold a further consultation on the new draft Charter. A spokesman told The Journal this week that a decision over the need for a further consultation would not be made until after it receives the amendments on the previously submitted Charter from the Society. If it deems the amendments to be small then there would be no need for further consultation because it would duplicate work already undertaken. But if the changes are significant then the Privy Council reserves the right to hold a consultation. Responses to the previous consultation will still be considered.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal