Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7310 p149
31 July 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 110K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Shipman inquiry
· Broad spectrum
· Public health
· Violence in pharmacies
· Pharmacy education
· Tablet identification
· Natural therapies
· Nasal sprays
· Dispensing
· The profession
· The Council
· The Society


Letters to the Editor

Natural therapies

Government should invest more in alternative therapies

What about the end service user?

Government should invest more in alternative therapies

From Mr H. M. Dowdalls, MRPharmS

With regard to Ian Jackson’s letter (PJ, 17 July, p83), I firmly believe there will come a time when integration between “alternative medicine” and “mainstream medicine” will not only happen but both “strands” augment the other so much that the benefits for the future would, I suggest, be undeniable.

I would, meekly, suggest that this Government, or the next, if not willing to invest more on alternative medicine in the NHS should perhaps, with the instigation of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, at least spend some money on investigating the benefits accrued by its use in other countries.

H. Dowdalls
Cupar, Fife


What about the end service user?

From Mr I. Jackson, MRPharmS

Christopher Anton and Anthony Cox express surprise at my disdain for conventional medicine (PJ, 24 July, p114). Actually, I am an advocate for conventional medicines such as simvastatin 40mg with firm primary endpoint data, eg, reduction in cardiovascular death.1

My argument is that many conventional medicines have no such evidence but are being pushed remorselessly by “big pharma”. Thanks to the new general medical services contract (points make prizes) there is a danger that conventional drugs without robust outcome data will be increasingly used as GPs chase Department of Health targets. If they require natural therapies to have a robust evidence base then the same rules should apply to conventional therapies. There would not be much left on the pharmacy shelves.

They admit that large numbers of patients are harmed by conventional medicines but the majority are avoidable by better medicines management. So have many hospital admissions have been prevented by the medicines management collaborative? Do I need to do a PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) to find out?

They question my example of mistletoe injections in the treatment of cancers. It is a shame they have failed to include the latest studies. The largest study involved 10,266 cancer patients in treatment centres across Germany. A pool of 396 matched pairs was formed in which one arm used conventional treatment and the other conventional plus mistletoe injections. The main outcome measure was survival time. The mistletoe group had a survival time 39 per cent greater (P<0.001). Those that used mistletoe for between 80–100 per cent relative to survival time saw a doubling in survival time from 3.48 years in the control group to 7.08 years in the mistletoe group (P<0.001).2 This adds some weight to the comment I made that “mistletoe works with the body’s immune system, rather than against it”.

They expressed concern over adverse drug reactions with mistletoe. A study (which is being considered for publication) may ease their concerns. A group of 1,442 patients with early stage breast cancer used either conventional therapy only or conventional plus mistletoe injections. It was found that 16.2 per cent of the mistletoe group and 54 per cent of the control group developed ADRs attributed to the conventional therapy (P=0.001).

Rather than reflecting on our competencies a really useful way of spending our time could be to read an excellent article in this month’s New Zealand Pharmacy called “Effectiveness of hawthorn extracts for heart complaints”. It discusses an ongoing study in 2,600 New York Heart Association class 2 to 3 heart failure patients with hawthorn extract or placebo alongside conventional therapies. They are looking at primary outcomes of cardiac death, non-lethal myocardial infarction and admission to hospital because of the progression of heart failure. The article ends with the phrase “this may change the attitude towards use of hawthorn extract in general”. Not in the UK — we are busy being amused by cupping!

At the end of the day, might it be a good idea to ask the patient (sorry, end service user) how he or she feels. As one drug representative said to me: “I’m so glad I can ask you about natural medicines for my family”.

Ian Jackson
Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

References

1. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 7–22.
2. Grossarth-Maticek R. Use of Iscador, an extract of European mistletoe (Viscum album), in cancer treatment: Prospective non randomised and randomised matched-pair studies. Alternative Therapies, May/June 2001;7:57–78.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Tablet identification)
Next Topic (Nasal sprays)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal