Personal control redefined
Under the provisions of the Medicines Act 1968, a community pharmacy should be under the personal control of a pharmacist. What precisely this means has never been tested in the courts and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and its Statutory Committee have employed a flexible interpretation in which each case is viewed on its merits. ‘Medicines, ethics
and practice’ advises us that, for example, a pharmacist’s
personal control is deemed to remain in place during a temporary absence
such as a 45-minute lunch break, but if the pharmacist leaves for the
whole afternoon then personal control ceases at once and the entire
premises must be closed immediately.
Such a fuzzy interpretation does not satisfy the current Statutory Committee
chairman, Lord Fraser of Carmyllie, QC, and he has now set down his exegesis
of the wording of the Act, in which personal control no longer focuses
on the pharmacist’s physical presence (p203). During the pharmacist’s
absence — even a prolonged one — the premises may remain
open for any business that does not require a pharmacist’s presence
or approval.
Of course, the pharmacist would need to be sure that the pharmacy staff
have clear, unequivocal instructions as to the limitations on their activities.
And it may be advisable to arrange the premises so that the dispensary
and pharmacy medicines can be securely closed off. Furthermore, nothing
in the new interpretation has any impact on the arrangements a pharmacist
may have under an NHS contract.
Nevertheless, pharmacists should welcome the clarification provided by
the chairman’s new interpretation. With appropriate safeguards
in place, a pharmacist may now more easily and confidently leave the
premises to engage in a broader range of health care activities.
Back to Top
|
New contraception advice guidance
New guidance has been issued by the Department of Health regarding the provision of contraceptive services to people aged under 16 years in England (p175). The guidance says that health care professionals are justified in giving confidential advice and treatment to under-16s provided the young person understands the advice and that the advice or treatment is in their best interests. This means that there is no obligation to inform the young person's parents or guardians.
The guidance applies to pharmacists who provide emergency hormonal contraception
under a patient group direction (provided the PGD itself specifies that
supply to under-16s can be made). However, it is not relevant to the
supply of EHC over the counter. EHC is licensed as a pharmacy medicine
for over-16s only and community pharmacists must be satisfied that the
client is aged at least 16 years, as has been the cas since over-the-counter
EHC was introduced in 2001. If not, then they should be sympathetic and
offer to help the client obtain EHC by a more appropriate route.
Back to Top
|