Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7312 p213
14 August 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Call for comparative atypical antipsychotic trials

Further evidence to help prescribers decide which atypical antipsychotic agent is best for an individual patient is urgently needed, according to a review in this month’s Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin, because each agent has a different side effect profile.

The bulletin says that, except for clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, head-to-head studies have not shown a convincing efficacy advantage for any one atypical antipsychotic over another. Increasing use, however, has revealed differing side effect profiles for each agent.

A review of the available evidence allows the bulletin to make some provisional recommendations. Where hyperprolactinaemia is a problem, prolactin-sparing drugs, such as quetiapine (Seroquel), olanzapine (Zyprexa) or aripiprazole (Abilify) may help. Quetiapine, along with amisulpiride (Solian), may also be a good choice when daytime sedation needs to be avoided.

Weight gain, says the DTB, appears to be most common with clozapine and olanzapine and less of a problem with amisulpiride and risperidone (Risperdal). These two agents also have a lower tendency to aggravate glucose intolerance or dyslipidaemia. For patients in whom postural hypotension could be dangerous, the DTB recommends avoiding atypical antipsychotics with alpha1 adrenoceptor-blocking properties (ie, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole [Serdolect] and zotepine [Zoleptil]).

Despite this provisional guidance, DTB says the need for more evidence is urgent. “There is a clear need for appropriate clinical trials to clarify differences between currently available drugs,” it concludes (2004;42:57).

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal