| · Retention fee
· Shipman inquiry
· Politicians
· Simvastatin
· EHC
· Careers in pharmacy
· Packaging
· Wildlife
· The Charter
· Council elections
Letters to the Editor
|
Shipman inquiry
Like arranging deckchairs on the Titanic
From Mr C. Morris, MRPharmS
I am writing to thank Mandie
Lavin for pointing out that we can report
inappropriate use of Controlled Drugs to the Royal Pharmaceutical Society
instead of having to try to break the ranks of the General Medical Council,
and for pointing out that if we believe a prescription to be incorrect
we should not dispense even if the doctor has confirmed it (PJ, 31 July,
p147); but I must say something regarding the addition of a patient’s
condition to a prescription.
If only this had been in place when Shipman was practising, or even a
better, a little box saying: “Please tick this box if drug is to
be used to euthanise patient.” Shipman would have ticked it and
would have been caught immediately!
When will people realise that those who intend to kill may lie about
it. A doctor could write one prescription for 20 ampoules of diamorphine,
write “cancer patient” on the prescription, collect the medicines
and have enough drug to kill dozens, without raising any eyebrows.
Several good things have come of the Shipman Inquiry: the loss of the
cumbersome handwritten CD book would be good and logging in the name
of the person collecting may help, but they could lie about that, too.
The major problem with Harold Shipman was the fact that one doctor could
sign the death certificate and report that no autopsy was needed; if
this were not the case Shipman would have been unable to operate the
way he did. The Shipman Inquiry really needs to do one thing: break the
autonomy of GPs. If it does not do this anything else it does just amounts
to arranging deckchairs on the Titanic.
Chris Morris
Newquay, Cornwall
|