Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7314 p278
28 August 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary

Related websites
OFT pharmacy report links (more)


Concerns expressed on control of entry reforms

Concerns have been expressed following last week's announcement of new rules on the awarding of NHS community pharmacy contracts (PJ, 21 August, p245).

Liberal Democrat shadow health secretary, Paul Burstow MP, warned that small independent pharmacies may be squeezed out, which would restrict customer access to pharmacy services. “It is appalling that Ministers have chosen to make this announcement in the summer recess. Parliament must get proper scrutiny of the new rules when they are brought in. It is important that the changes do not jeopardise access to new services that pharmacies are providing,” he said.

Mr Burstow added: “Ministers have failed to consider the shortage of pharmacists around the country. Allowing big shopping centres and supermarkets aggressively to recruit more pharmacists will threaten community and hospital pharmacies. These changes need to be evaluated, and their impact on communities reviewed.”

Steve Dunn, group managing director of AAH Pharmaceuticals and chairman of the British Association of Pharmaceutical Wholesalers, said that feedback he had received from community pharmacists suggested that they were reassured that the reforms had proved less dramatic than feared. However, they still had reservations. “Though it has not been widened as far as feared, the door to fresh competition has nevertheless been opened and there is no guarantee that it will not swing further ajar in the future,” he commented. The relaxation of controls for wholly internet or mail-order pharmacies posed a definite risk, he added.

Numark’s marketing director, Andrew Sollitt, commented that Numark remained deeply concerned about the proposed changes. “Our main area of concern surrounds the ‘competition and choice’ criteria with regard to the current regulatory test. There is a complete lack of definition from the Department of Health as to what this means,” he said. “We also wish to know what opportunities there will be for representatives of pharmacy bodies to have input into the tests for competition and choice.”

Altogether, the Government received 270 responses to its consultation on reforming the control of entry regulations. Of these, 40 were from local pharmaceutical committees, 53 were from pharmacy businesses, 66 were from NHS bodies and 63 were from members of Parliament. A further 48 were from representative groups, professional groups and individual pharmacists. A summary of the responses was published on the Department of Health’s website last week.

Back to Top

©The Pharmaceutical Journal