Flood problems from Noah to Venice
Gilbert
Chesterton in 1914 composed a comic comment: And Noah he often said
to his wife when he sat down to dine / I dont care where the water
goes if it doesnt get into the wine.
Before and since then, there have been many different suggestions regarding
the traditional great flood associate with Noah, where it arose and where
it went, and even whether it really happened.
A feature in Nature for 12 August, by Quirin Schiemeier, discusses the
question and recounts some fascinating aspects of it. Seven years ago,
writes Schiemeier, the marine geologists William Ryan and Walter Pitman
of New York hypothesised that the famous flood affected the Black Sea
basin, which, until some eight millennia ago, held a large freshwater
lake. Sea water then burst through the Bosporos Strait and raised the
lake level some 100m in a few years, inundating the Neolithic settlements
lining its shores.
More recently, the oceanographer Mark Siddall has worked on a computer
model based on existing geological features to discover how a massive
flood would have transformed the Black Sea basin. Siddall became fascinated
by the problem while at the Southampton Oceanography Centre, and consulted
Ryan in New York. He decided that a sudden flood of the region would have
taken 33 years to stabilise, and not the traditional 40 days and 40 nights.
Nevertheless, there is no need, he maintained, to discount the Biblical
account entirely. Further investigations are being undertaken to search
for discontinuities in the sediments around the Black Sea shores to discover
whether in fact there was a cataclysmic flood of seawater there about
8,400 years ago.
The floods of Venice are a far more worrying phenomenon, according to
Michelle Knott, writing in New Scientist for 24 July. Oceans
nursling, as Shelley called Venice in 1818, was built on 118 small
islands within a lagoon, with some 400 bridges linking them. Any coincidence
between spring tides and storm surges in the Adriatic inevitably brought
floods into the streets of Venice and threatened its buildings.
In the early part of the 20th century St Marks Square was flooded
fewer than 10 times a year but by the 1980s it was flooding 40 times every
winter. Today the flooding rate has increased to 60 per year. Increased
flooding was attributed to subsidence, both natural and induced by the
pumping out of reservoirs underlying the buildings between the 1930s and
1970s.
Controversial plans have been devised to remedy the situation. They involve
either preventing the sea from invading or raising the entire ground on
which Venice stands. Flood barriers restricting the three inlets to the
lagoon, which can be raised into position from the lagoon bed by introducing
compressed air, have been constructed, but the scheme has not been completed.
Moreover, any interference with the free exchange of water between the
lagoon and the sea might well raise a sewage problem in the long run.
Alternatively, the ground level in the lowest parts of the city could
be artificially raised gradually, a move which has already seen some practical
advances. It is calculated that within 30 years nearly all the city could
be more than 110cm above the baseline sea level. All the same, the future
prospects look gloomy. And the main aim is to gain extra time to enable
a better solution to be devised.
Back to Top
|