How the truth may be reached through intuition rather than evidence
The mind is a strange thing, almost impossible to define with accuracy, and it worries not only psychiatrists but also philosophers. One particularly shady corner of it is what goes by the name of intuition, a quality not universally accepted by experts on psychology.
I was reminded of the strangeness of this phenomenon by reading an account by
Ralph Edwards, in The Lancet for 24 July, of two clinical cases in which his
intuition correctly convinced him that a medical error had been made although
hard evidence of it was lacking at the time.
Intuition is defined by the lexicographers as the power of the mind by which
it immediately perceives the truth of things without using reasoning or analysis.
In modern philosophy, intuition is the immediate apprehension of an object or
idea by the mind without the intervention of any reasoning process or immediate
apprehension by the intellect alone, and has been confused with instinct. However,
humans are able to have recourse to both instincts and intuitions, whereas other
animals are supposed to be unable to reason and can only make use of instinct.
According to John Locke, our knowledge of our own existence is intuitive. According
to Immanuel Kant, space and time can be regarded as forms of intuition, and not
as theoretical concepts. Henri Bergson wrote: “By intuition I mean instinct
that has become disinterested, self-conscious, capable of reflecting upon its
object and enlarging it indefinitely”.
And finally, Carl Jung asserted that that the fundamental functions of the psyche
include sensation, thinking, feeling and intuition. Sensation he defined as perception
by organs of sense, thinking as intellectual cognition leading to logical conclusions,
feeling as subjective evaluation, and intuition as perception through an unconscious
method or perception or perception of an unconscious content.
Intuition, Jung maintained, should permit us to guess possibilities and backgrounds.
So perhaps, while not claiming some kind of spiritual superiority, it might be
excellent advice to encourage our faculty of intuition. Apparently it can spur
us to action without the sometimes fatal delay involved in plain thinking.
Back to Top
|