| · Counterfeit drugs
· Packaging
· Simvastatin
· Shipman inquiry
· The register
· Personal control
· The Society
· New contract
· Employee pharmacists
· Tuberculosis
· Retention fee
· Overseas membership
· Onlooker
Letters to the Editor
|
Shipman inquiry
Joined-up audit is required
From Mr P. B. Lowe, MRPharmS
Nigel Morley’s response (PJ, 11 September, p345) reinforces my
argument (PJ, 28 August, p287) regarding the proposals of the Shipman
Inquiry. Only Shipman’s greed, arrogance and carelessness revealed
his murders; only the murders revealed his misappropriation of Controlled
Drugs. It had previously taken a considerable time before Shipman’s
diversion of pethidine for his own use came to light and then he was
permitted to continue practising and subsequently to resume prescribing
CDs.
Dame Janet Smith’s recommendations for auditing pharmacy and patient-held
stocks and for tightening control of pharmacy supplies will provide fragmentary
audit. The dispensing pharmacist may have no contact with the patient
and is denied access to medical practice records: so who will check where
the drugs go when they leave the pharmacy?
Detecting abuse of the system will continue to rely on retrospective
correlation of transactions and subjective interpretation of anomalies
in the log, which may be difficult to detect if the perpetrator obtains
supplies at a large number of pharmacies.
To close this loophole requires joined-up audit and extemporaneous intervention,real
team working and the acceptance of mutual governance in primary care,
community pharmacy access to prescribing records and the dispensing of
CDs only to a registered cohort of patients. The lack of pharmacy input
to drug procurement by dispensing doctors will, however, remain a matter
for concern.
Peter Lowe
Community Pharmacy Development Manager
Sunderland Teaching Primary Care Trust
|