Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7317 p382-383
18 September 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 110K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Counterfeit drugs
· Packaging
· Simvastatin
· Shipman inquiry
· The register
· Personal control
· The Society
· New contract
· Employee pharmacists
· Tuberculosis
· Retention fee
· Overseas membership
· Onlooker


Letters to the Editor

Employee pharmacists

Need for more control over working environments

From Mr M. Koziol, MRPharmS

The remarks by Lloydspharmacy superintendent Andy Murdock which so clearly upset John Blake (PJ, 11 September, p347) were made in response to an error which caused harm to a patient, and he explained that the Lloyds pharmacists in the Bristol area would now be undergoing some retraining.

Crucially, the sentiments expressed by Mr Blake are symptomatic of a much wider problem in community pharmacy, which is that pharmacists at the coal face are often working in situations which they feel are unacceptable. Inevitably, they are driven to continue in the belief that no matter what, they must continue to provide a service to the public as best they can, even in difficult circumstances. Consequently, when an error occurs, it is generally they who are held responsible by either the patient, the employer, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and, in the worst cases, even the Crown Prosecution Service.

The Pharmacists Defence Association is concerned by the number of errors caused by inadequate pharmacy environments. I can confirm that our comprehensive research into this area, which has involved the input of more than 2,000 pharmacists through surveys, questionnaires and focus groups, shows that Mr Blake’s views are widely held.

The challenge in the findings is that, if pharmacists are to take responsibility, then they must have more control over their working environment. There are ways in which this could be done, but it will take a huge culture shift at many levels within the profession, as currently it is the employers who enjoy that control. Moreover, improvement measures will cost employers money as more trained staff may be needed and safer practices may need to be adopted.

The work of the PDA will be comprehensively debated at the PDA national conference early next year and we hope that we can help pharmacists become more professionally assertive by examining ways in which they can begin to take control of their working environments. Importantly, following more consultation with pharmacists, employer organisations and the Society we will be hoping to launch an important initiative along the lines of Mr Blake’s proposed “new charter” for employee pharmacists. In the meantime, any pharmacists who would like to express their views confidentially are encouraged to contact us via www.the-pda.org

Mark Koziol
Director
The Pharmacists’ Defence Association

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (New contract)
Next Topic (Tuberculosis)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal