Weeding out the fiction
A comment by Dean Wingerchuk of the Multiple Sclerosis Center of the Mayo Clinic, published in The Lancet for 24 July, examines some of the evidence for and against the medical use of cannabis for refractory neurological symptoms such as pain, spasticity, tremor and sleep disorders. In spite of assertions that cannabis confers benefits in such conditions, there have been social and legal obstacles to serious clinical evaluation of this substance.
One complicating issue is that cannabis contains hundreds of constituents, including
more than 60 cannabinoids, of which delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol is the primary
active member. The discovery of cannabinoid receptors in the central nervous
system, modulating psychoactive effects, offers some evidence for regarding endocannabinoid
drugs as of possible value for symptom relief in people suffering from multiple
sclerosis or epilepsy. It has been found that some 36 per cent of patients with
multiple sclerosis in one group examined had tried cannabis, and 14 per cent
had taken it to relieve their symptoms, with only 3 per cent developing dependence
on it. Statistics from Canada, the US and the UK, despite different political
and legal climates, have shown similar results.
Medical use of cannabis for multiple sclerosis has been associated with its recreational
use and with tobacco smoking. Overall, its use in epilepsy has been associated
with the use of other illicit substances and it is thought that people indulging
in recreational drug experiences may pose a greater risk of resorting to cannabis
and developing dependency. Many active users may be seeking to relieve secondary
effects of their underlying disease, and any major mood disorders and neurological
disability should be investigated.
There is little scientific evidence of the effectiveness of cannabis for neurological
symptoms. There are no controlled data justifying its use in epilepsy, while
in multiple sclerosis its effects on spasticity have been variable and tremor
is not affected. Cannabis studies have included many variables, including formulations,
dosage difficulties and method of delivery. Some patients insist that the drug
is effective only when smoked. A strong placebo effect must be allowed for. Any
future studies require rigid control and careful evaluation.
Back to Top
|