Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / News Centre | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7318 p447
25 September 2004


Society summary


Council endorses clarification of procedure for introducing new membership categories

The Council has endorsed a rewording of Article 5 of the draft new Charter to clarify the procedure for establishing any new category of membership.

The revised wording, required by the Privy Council’s advisers, is: “The membership of the Society shall consist of the persons who are for the time being registered pharmacists in Great Britain and such other categories of person as may be specified by Special Resolution and approved by order of Our Privy Council.”

The Council’s draft wording had concluded: “... and such other persons in such other categories as may be approved by Special Resolution and by order of Our Privy Council.”

When the amendment to Article 5 was considered at the September Council meeting, Mr Dajani asked why the word “approved” had been changed to “specified”. The whole idea of being approved was that the membership could influence Council policy. It was not a clarification but a change of meaning.

Robert Bulling said that the point was that it was only at the point of approval by the Privy Council that a proposal took effect. A Special Resolution could propose it but not purport to approve it. That was the distinction, albeit a narrow one.

Mr Dajani said that the idea was that the proposal would be approved both by special resolution and by the Privy Council.

Mr Bulling said that that would be the effect of it.

Mr Astbury said that the amendment introduced a fundamental change and he would not vote for it.

The President said that, if nobody else wished to speak, he would put the amendment to the vote. It was ultimately for the Queen and the Privy Council to determine, but the Council should take a view on it.

The amendment was then put to the vote, and was approved.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal