|
Community pharmacies offer a particular advantage as a location for
pharmacist prescribers because of their long opening hours, explained
Ashok Soni,
chairman of the National Pharmaceutical Association and a supplementary
prescriber. “Our local surgery is open approximately 20 hours
a week whereas the average community pharmacy is open for 60 to 70
hours a week,” he said. The pharmacy could be a different point
of access. “This provides patients with an opportunity to access
services at a time that suits them.”
Turning to the profession itself, he said that as supplementary prescribers
community pharmacists are more integrated in the health care team. Opportunities
for prescribing pharmacists include managing long-term conditions, negotiating
with patients so that they become more compliant and reducing adverse
drug reactions.
However, there are some threats, too. First is the lack of access to
patients’ records in community pharmacy. “There is a real
need to put pressure on central Government to allow pharmacists greater
access to patients’ medical histories,” he said. Another
threat is potential conflict between pharmacists, doctors and patients,
such as lack of trust or disagreements. Time constraints also pose a
threat to supplementary prescribing.
Commenting on the issue of whether pharmacists should be generalists
or specialists, Mr Soni said that community pharmacists need to be generalists. “There
is no point in a patient having to go to one pharmacy for one thing and
another pharmacy down the road for something else,” he explained. Primary/secondary care interface

Duncan McRobbie: specialist clinic |
Pharmacists interact with patients in hospital but the problem is what
happens before and what happens after, said Duncan McRobbie, principal
clinical pharmacist at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital NHS
Trust, London. Two and a half years ago, a local GP surgery approached
him about setting up a clinic to improve continuity of care. The clinic’s
roles include tackling sub-optimal management of ischaemic heart disease,
heart failure, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. The clinic takes
referrals from GPs and reviews patients on the surgery’s coronary
heart disease register. Mr McRobbie deals with repeat prescriptions,
suggesting new medicines or dose adjustments in 20 per cent of cases
and discontinuing unnecessary medicines in 15 per cent.
When supplementary prescribing was introduced, the clinic team, GPs
and hospital consultant drew up clinical management plans for pharmacist
prescribers. “We have done some work to assess the appropriateness
of the pharmacist’s prescribing,” said Mr McRobbie. “The
data show a trend towards better prescribing in terms of appropriateness
of what is prescribed and monitoring of its safety and efficacy.”
Mr McRobbie said that one of the benefits of the clinic is that it allows
trained expertise to be brought into the GP practice. Dealing with patients
with CHD is only a small part of a GP’s total workload, but it
is Mr McRobbie’s specialist area. Another benefit is that it provides
him with the opportunity to follow up patients he has seen in the clinic
when they are admitted to hospital and vice versa. In terms of difficulties,
he said having to hand-write prescriptions is a backwards step.
He concluded that with a trained pool of pharmacists in community and
hospital pharmacy there seems to be competition over who should be carrying
out roles such as his. “PCTs should take an overall look and decide
who is best to provide each service. It should not be a case of services
being provided only by hospital pharmacists or only by community pharmacists,” he
said. Success but issues remain

Anne Lovejoy: problems in primary care |
Anne Lovejoy, lecturer in pharmacy practice at King’s College,
London, reported the experiences of some of the pharmacists who undertook
supplementary prescribing training at King’s. Altogether, 59 per
cent of the students were hospital pharmacists and the remainder were
evenly split between primary care pharmacy and community pharmacy. “Most
qualified in the spring so services are only just getting going now,” she
said.
Those who have started prescribing are doing an exemplary job, said Ms
Lovejoy. “Hospital pharmacists have been leading out-patient clinics.
Two clinics are for heart failure and, since they began, the number of
re-admissions has reduced so these clinics are improving patient services,” she
said. Other clinical areas in which hospital pharmacists are prescribing
include critical care, HIV, coronary heart disease and oncology. But
in primary care, many of the services have yet to start although plans
are in place for medicines management clinics in areas such as diabetes,
epilepsy and arthritis.
Ms Lovejoy explained that in the acute sector, clinics have been working
on the edge of the legislation for a number of years but that this means
that supplementary prescribing could be added relatively easily. “In
primary care, it is a little different,” she said. “PCTs
are reticent and nervous about supplementary prescribers.” Not
only are PCTs concerned about clinical governance responsibilities arising
from supplementary prescribing but they are also anxious about other
issues, such as additional prescribers ruining their prescribing budgets.
“
So of the 13 community pharmacists who undertook the King’s course,
only two have got a service funded,” she said. Despite this, she
commented: “We have to start
somewhere and not be put off by these problems.”
For this new scope of practice to succeed, pharmacists will have to work
with other health care professionals, health organisations and patients. “We
have no idea how patients will respond to other types of prescriber,” she
commented. A success of the clinical management plan used in supplementary
prescribing is that it had forced health professionals to work in a team
with each other and patients, she said.
Independent prescribing
During the question-and-answer session, the
speakers were asked about independent prescribing for pharmacists.
Mr Soni said that
although independent prescribing is the holy grail, part of the
process of getting there is demonstrating that supplementary prescribing
works and through this that pharmacist prescribers will not drain
the prescribing budget.
Ms Lovejoy was concerned about pharmacists
having a formulary to which drugs are continually added, something
that has happened for nurse prescribers. “I would not like
pharmacists to go down this road,” she said.
Mr McRobbie
commented that although pharmacists are capable of selecting
medicines after diagnosis, he was not convinced that they know
enough about
diagnosis for independent prescribing. |
|