Home > PJ (current issue) > Leading article | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7319 p452
2 October 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 45K, Acrobat Reader

Leading Article

Make your voice heard

Pharmacists need assertiveness training. That suggestion came from John D’Arcy, chief executive of the National Pharmaceutical Association, when he was chairing a session on leadership and pharmacy at the British Pharmaceutical Conference earlier this week.

Such an idea might be anathema to some sections of the profession. However, it could be an increasingly appealing idea to those pharmacists who are concerned that if the profession does not keep a sharp lookout, developments in the NHS will pass them by and they will miss the opportunities to become key players in the provision of health care.

The question is, why do people like Mr D’Arcy believe that pharmacists would benefit from such training? Why do some pharmacists lack confidence when they are in meetings with other health care professionals and health service managers? Many pharmacists accept that, as a group, they can be introspective, some even going so far as to describe their colleagues as “blinkered”.

There are, no doubt, hundreds of different psychological and sociological theories to explain why pharmacists behave like they do. PhD theses could be written round why the profession as a whole seems so reluctant to come forward, even though there are hundreds of individual pharmacists who promote themselves and their skills effectively.

One possibility, also raised at the BPC leadership session, particularly with regard to the relationship of community pharmacists with GPs, is that pharmacists are often necessarily the reactive partners: they have to wait for a diagnosis to be made and the prescription to be written before their skills can be used. However, in clinical situations where pharmacists’ skills are not so subservient they may be held in higher regard and, therefore, will think more highly of themselves.

Radical thinkers might wish schools of pharmacy to put assertiveness training on the undergraduate curriculum now but, although that will help the future generation, it will do little for pharmacists today, struggling to make their voices heard.

One way for pharmacists to assert themselves is to go out and look for the opportunities, take hold of them and do something with them (pharmacists who wait to be approached could be waiting forever). First time round, the service created as a result may not be perfect, but that will not matter. More importantly, it will be a start and the more pharmacists who take that approach, the harder it will be for other health professions, their primary care organisation and their hospital trust to ignore them.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal