Home > PJ (current issue) > Meetings

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7320 p531
9 October 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 430K, Acrobat Reader

British Pharmaceutical Conference 2004

Regulators likely to insist on genetic testing soon

The 2004 British Pharmaceutical Conference and Exhibition “Medicines: from cell to society” took place at Manchester International Convention Centre from 27–29 September

BPC 2004 summary


Tony Moffat

Tony Moffat: genetic tests mandatory

Regulatory agencies are a whisker away from including genetic testing requirements in marketing authorisations for new drugs, according to Tony Moffat, chief scientist at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society.

Professor Moffat predicted that for certain drugs genetic tests would be made mandatory before the drug could be prescribed. He illustrated his point with the example of Strattera (atomoxetine), a new drug licensed for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

The drug is primarily cleared by CYP2D6 cytochrome P450 enzymes and, in clinical trials, patients who were poor metabolisers suffered more adverse drug reactions than those who were extensive metabolisers. When considering the application for marketing approval of Strattera, the US Food and Drug Administration suggested that genetic tests should be conducted before use.

“That was ground-breaking,” said Professor Moffat. The FDA could not go further than this because there were no FDA-approved tests. Had there been an approved test, Professor Moffat believes that genetic testing would have formed an integral part of the drug’s licence.

“We are now at the brink — the FDA has said you should test, but they are only a gnat’s whisker away from saying you must test.”

Professor Moffat went on to say that the FDA also wants to improve the risk benefit ratios of four other drugs — azathioprine, mercaptopurine, warfarin and irinotecan — by including pharmacogenetic information in their marketing authorisations. “The FDA is asking companies for information about pharmacogenetic testing of individuals and the adverse drug reactions that those patients experienced so it can consider whether to change the marketing authorisation of the drugs. That is going on now,” he said.

In the case of mercaptopurine, Professor Moffat explained that the degree of bone marrow toxicity seen in a particular patient was dependent on their genetic profile. Those with a limited capability for metabolising mercaptopurine needed a lower dose than extensive metabolisers. One in 300 patients would need just 10 to 20 per cent of the normal dose if they were to avoid bone marrow toxicity. “The FDA is revising the [marketing authorisation] now. Tests are available and I think they will make it mandatory to test patients before these drugs are given,” he said.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal